Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
STC.UNM v. Intel Corporation
Case Number:
13-1241
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 18, 2014
Fed. Circ.'s Latest Patent-Specific Rule May Rile Justices
A split Federal Circuit decision that patent co-owners cannot be forced to join an infringement suit may be ripe for U.S. Supreme Court review, attorneys say, since it appears to set a rule that applies only in patent law, a practice by the appeals court that the justices have repeatedly criticized.
-
September 17, 2014
Fed. Circ. Says Suits Doomed When Patent Co-Owner Opts Out
In a sharply split decision Wednesday, the full Federal Circuit declined to review a ruling in a semiconductor patent dispute that found infringement suits must be thrown out when the co-owner of a patent decides not to participate, with the judges at odds over whether unwilling co-owners can be forced to join a case.
-
June 06, 2014
Fed. Circ. Tosses University's Patent Suit Against Intel
A divided Federal Circuit on Friday affirmed a district court's dismissal of a suit brought by the University of New Mexico's patent arm alleging Intel Corp. infringed a patent for lithographic methods used in semiconductor manufacturing, ruling that the plaintiff lacks standing because the patent's co-owner elected to not join the suit.