Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
Case Number:
12-15185
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 04, 2014
9th Circ. Revives Panasonic Memory Card Cartel Suit
The Ninth Circuit on Friday revived Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s suit alleging Panasonic Corp. restrained competition through a patent-licensing deal on secure digital memory cards, ruling that the suit isn't time-barred because Samsung alleged anti-competitive actions that occurred within the four-year statute of limitations.
-
December 05, 2013
Memory Card Patent Cartel Claims Timely, 9th Circ. Told
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and a class of consumers urged the Ninth Circuit on Thursday to revive their separate antitrust suits over an alleged patent-licensing cartel among Panasonic Corp. and other flash memory card makers, arguing that a district court judge incorrectly found both sets of claims time-barred.