Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Rahman v. Mott's LLP et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-03482
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 04, 2014
Mott's Fends Off Class Cert. In Apple Juice False-Ad Row
A California federal judge denied certification to a proposed class alleging that Mott's LLP mislabeled its apple juice, ruling Wednesday that the plaintiff failed to say why certifying a liability-only class would be more efficient or desirable.
-
October 15, 2014
Judge Plucks Mott's 'No Sugar Added' Class Action Claims
A California federal judge on Wednesday pared a bulk of the claims from a proposed class action alleging Mott's LLP mislabeled its apple juice but ruled a trial should determine whether the plaintiff had relied on the juice's "no sugar added" label.
-
April 09, 2014
Mott's Can't Squeeze 'No Sugar Added' Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday rejected Mott's LLP's bid to toss a proposed class action alleging its apple products are improperly labeled as having "no sugar added," finding the plaintiffs thus far have shown that a reasonable consumer could be deceived.
-
January 30, 2014
Mott's Gets 'No Sugar Added' Labeling Claims Cut Down
A California federal judge on Wednesday trimmed from a proposed class action claims alleging Mott's LLP's applesauce products are improperly labeled as having "no sugar added," but let stand similar claims concerning the company's apple juice.