Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Zack Ward, et al v. Apple, Inc.
Case Number:
12-17805
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 29, 2015
9th Circ Revives Apple, AT&T Antitrust Class Action
A plaintiff alleging an antitrust conspiracy doesn't need to include all the possible co-conspirators as defendants unless they have an identifiable interest in a lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit said Monday in reviving a proposed class action claiming Apple Inc. illegally locked iPhone customers into AT&T Mobility LLC cellphone plans.
-
January 16, 2015
IPhone Class Takes Apple Antitrust Battle To 9th Circ.
A proposed class of iPhone users urged the Ninth Circuit on Friday to revive their claims that Apple Inc. violated antitrust law by locking customers into AT&T Mobility LLC cellphone plans, saying that a lower court's dismissal for failing to add AT&T as a defendant "ignores three-quarters of a century of jurisprudence."