Coverage
-
June 06, 2014
The Eighth Circuit has ruled that a Minnesota federal judge abused her discretion when she excluded expert testimony in a lawsuit seeking to link Mead Johnson & Co. LLC’s infant formula and a child’s disabling illness, and revived the child’s guardian’s suit against the company. [Correction: An earlier story misstated that the appeals court's ruling applied to expert testimony regarding a genetic test known as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, or PFGE, analysis. The error has been corrected.]
1 other articles on this case.
View all »