Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Case Number:
12-1042
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 01, 2016
Fed. Circ. Won't Review 'Baffling' Decision In Cisco IP Case
The Federal Circuit on Tuesday refused to review its ruling that reversed a $74 million jury verdict that found Cisco Systems Inc. infringed Commil USA LLC's wireless networking patent, despite Commil's argument that the previous decision was "legally baffling."
-
January 28, 2016
Commil Seeks Fed. Circ. Review Of Its 'Baffling' Cisco Ruling
Commil USA LLC urged the full Federal Circuit on Wednesday to review a ruling that reversed a $74 million jury verdict that found Cisco Systems Inc. infringed its wireless networking patent, calling the decision "legally baffling."
-
January 04, 2016
Cisco Prevails Again In Commil Patent Case At Fed. Circ.
The Federal Circuit has again wiped out a $74 million jury verdict that found Cisco Systems Inc. infringed a Commil USA LLC wireless networking patent, a ruling that comes several months after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered it to reconsider an earlier decision.
-
August 06, 2015
Cisco Tells Fed. Circ. It Should Win Commil Patent Case
Cisco Systems Inc. told the Federal Circuit Tuesday that it should direct a lower court to enter a judgment that it did not infringe a Commil USA LLC's wireless networking patent, just months after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated a previous Federal Circuit ruling that threw out a $74 million induced infringement verdict against Cisco.
-
January 23, 2015
Commil Urges High Court To Nix 'Good Faith' Patent Defense
Commil USA LLC has filed its opening brief at the Supreme Court in its case against Cisco Systems Inc. over whether a "good faith belief" that a patent is invalid can serve as a defense to induced infringement, saying the defense conflicts with the high court's precedent.
-
January 01, 2014
IP Cases To Watch In 2014
Closely watched intellectual property cases in the coming year could finally establish clear standards for when software involving abstract ideas can be patented, make it easier for patent owners who bring baseless suits to be sanctioned and decide the fate of a powerful new defense to induced infringement.