In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation

Track this case

Case Number:

1:14-md-02542

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action, Multi-district Litigation

Judge:

Vernon S. Broderick

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. April 23, 2020

    Keurig Buyers Say Amazon Defying Antitrust MDL Subpoena

    Indirect purchasers accusing Keurig Inc. of monopolizing the market for single-serve coffee packs have filed a motion to compel Amazon.com Inc. to turn over its coffee pod sales data.

  2. February 28, 2020

    Coffeemaker Roasts Keurig's 'Delay Strategy' In Antitrust MDL

    A California-based coffee company alerted a New York federal judge to an alleged "delay strategy" by Keurig Inc. in yearslong multidistrict litigation, arguing that the family-run operation has been unfairly forced to wait over five years to establish its case against the coffee machine giant.

  3. October 01, 2019

    Keurig Can't Recover Rival's Docs In Antitrust MDL

    A New York federal magistrate judge nixed Keurig's bid to uncover documents from TreeHouse Foods in a long-running antitrust suit against the coffee machine giant, ruling that the records from a prior patent challenge between the companies are irrelevant to this case.

  4. May 02, 2019

    Keurig Says Coffee Buyers Out Of Time To Revive Claims

    Indirect buyers of Keurig's K-Cups waited too long to try reviving state law antitrust claims in the yearslong multidistrict litigation against the company, the coffee machine giant told a New York federal judge.

  5. April 24, 2019

    Keurig MDL Judge Finally Pours Out Antitrust Opinion

    A New York federal judge on Wednesday delivered a much-needed jolt to a yearslong multidistrict litigation against Keurig, finally spelling out the reasons in an unsealed opinion as to why the coffee appliance giant couldn't duck antitrust claims.

  6. April 05, 2019

    Long-Brewing Opinion In Keurig Antitrust Suit Finally Arrives

    A New York federal judge has finally delivered a promised opinion explaining his earlier decision largely rejecting Keurig's bid to toss long-running antitrust allegations from purchasers and competitors of its K-Cup coffee pods, although it is still under seal.

  7. January 28, 2019

    4 Years Later, Keurig Antitrust Row Awaits Dismissal Ruling

    Purchasers and competitors of Keurig's K-Cup coffee pods asked a New York federal judge for a status conference in their long-running antitrust litigation, saying their case was being hamstrung by a still-unresolved motion to dismiss the coffee maker filed nearly four years ago.

  8. December 04, 2017

    Keurig Green Mountain Can't Stop K-Cup Monopoly Suits

    A New York federal judge rejected requests by Keurig Green Mountain Inc. to dismiss multiple lawsuits brought by direct purchasers of K-Cup coffee pods, alleging its coffee maker freezes out competitors' coffee cups as part of an anti-competitive scheme.

  9. August 01, 2016

    Limited Discovery OK'd In Keurig Antitrust MDL

    A New York federal judge said on Monday he would partially lift his stay of discovery in wide-ranging antitrust multidistrict litigation against Keurig Green Mountain Inc. despite a pending motion by the single-serve coffee giant to dismiss the case bought by rivals TreeHouse Foods Inc. and Rogers Family Co. Inc., among others.

  10. July 09, 2015

    Keurig Says K-Cup Buyers Lack Standing In Monopoly Row

    Keurig Green Mountain Inc. sought Thursday to cut claims that monopolist practices forced K-Cup buyers to overpay for caffeine fixes from a sprawling antitrust action, arguing that competitors like TreeHouse Foods Inc. and Rogers Family Co. Inc. are its actual litigation adversaries and that so-called direct and indirect purchasers lack standing.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!