Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-07510
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
- Lexington Insurance Co.
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Group
- Maxum Specialty Insurance Group
- PartnerRe Ltd.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 06, 2015
Amtrak Settles With Primary Insurers In Sandy Coverage Row
Amtrak has reached a settlement with its primary insurers in a suit seeking compensation for property damage caused by Superstorm Sandy, according to court documents filed late Thursday.
-
July 02, 2015
Amtrak Denied Bid To Keep Insurers In Sandy Damage Suit
A New York federal judge on Thursday denied Amtrak's motion to reconsider an order dismissing certain insurers from a suit seeking compensation for rail damage caused by Superstorm Sandy, effectively pulling the excess insurers from a breach of contract trial set to begin next month.
-
June 30, 2015
Insurers Say Amtrak Can't Force Wind Claims Into Sandy Suit
Excess insurers told a New York federal judge on Tuesday not to undo a recent decision dismissing them from Amtrak's suit seeking compensation for rail damage caused by Superstorm Sandy, claiming that Amtrak has contradicted itself by trying to shoehorn wind-related claims into its suit.
-
June 24, 2015
Amtrak's Sandy Recovery Capped At $125M In Flood Finding
A New York federal judge ruled Wednesday that a storm surge that filled several Amtrak tunnels after Superstorm Sandy constituted flooding under Amtrak's insurance policies, limiting the rail giant's recovery to a $125 million sublimit and dismissing a slew of excess insurers from the dispute.
-
June 11, 2015
Insurers Blast Amtrak For Flip-Flopping On Damages
Amtrak should dismiss a breach of contract claim from its suit seeking $1.2 billion from insurers over rail damage from Superstorm Sandy after abruptly changing course and telling a New York federal court it's fine with just $61 million it already received, the insurers said Wednesday.
-
May 29, 2015
Amtrak Fights For Experts In $1B Sandy Coverage Suit
Amtrak urged a New York federal judge Thursday to rebuff efforts by insurance companies to exclude its expert testimony and reports regarding rail damage in a $1 billion coverage battle over losses caused by Superstorm Sandy, saying that the insurers' arguments are either premature or meritless.
-
April 24, 2015
Sandy Was No Flood, Amtrak Says In $1B Insurance Suit
Amtrak on Friday urged a New York federal judge to reject insurers' bid to shrink a $1 billion dispute over losses tied to Superstorm Sandy by defining the disaster as a flood subject to a $125 million sublimit, saying almost none of the policies' definitions of flooding included storm surges.
-
March 09, 2015
Amtrak Claims Right To Sue Reinsurer In $1B Sandy Row
Amtrak argued in New York federal court Friday that it has a right to sue Partner Reinsurance Europe PLC in a $1 billion dispute over losses tied to Superstorm Sandy because the reinsurer was responsible for handling its claim and obligated to pay it directly.
-
February 23, 2015
Amtrak Can't Sue Reinsurer In $1B Sandy Row, Court Told
Partner Reinsurance Europe PLC urged a New York federal court Friday to dismiss all of Amtrak's claims against it in an insurance coverage suit over more than $1 billion in losses tied to Superstorm Sandy, contending that Amtrak can't sue the reinsurer directly because the parties lack privity.
-
February 18, 2015
Judge Won't Rule On Policy Terms In Amtrak's $1B Sandy Suit
A New York federal judge on Tuesday denied Amtrak's motions with regard to two key terms in policies issued by a slew of insurers in its coverage suit over more than $1 billion in losses tied to Superstorm Sandy, and dismissed part of its claim for unspecified "consequential" damages.