Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Dyson, Inc. v. SharkNinja Operating LLC et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-09442
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 02, 2019
Dyson's False Ad Award Against SharkNinja Bumped To $18M
Dyson Inc.'s $16 million false advertising verdict against rival vacuum cleaner-maker SharkNinja not only will stand, it'll be increased to $18 million after an Illinois federal court found the jury's decision was reasonable and Dyson is entitled to interest.
-
July 10, 2018
Dyson, SharkNinja Say $16M False Ad Verdict Wrong
Dyson Inc. and SharkNinja Operating LLC urged an Illinois federal judge to change a jury’s $16 million verdict in their false advertising suit, with the former saying its award was $2 million short and the latter claiming the amount should be either reduced or nixed altogether.
-
June 11, 2018
Jury Awards Dyson $16M Over Rival's False Vacuum Ads
An Illinois federal jury awarded Dyson Inc. more than $16 million in damages Monday after finding rival SharkNinja Operating LLC falsely advertised its Rotator Powered Lift-Away as a better product than Dyson's best-performing machine at the time.
-
May 30, 2018
Rival Rigged Vacuum Test To Support Ad, Dyson Tells Jury
The tests that vacuum manufacturer SharkNinja Operating LLC claimed to be independent while advertising a product to compete with Dyson Inc.'s best-performing vacuum cleaner were actually conducted at the company's direction and not independent at all, counsel for Dyson told an Illinois federal jury Wednesday.
-
May 29, 2018
Jury Impaneled In Dyson False Ad Suit Ahead Of Trial Kickoff
An Illinois federal judge impaneled a jury on Tuesday, one day before opening statements kick off a trial to determine whether SharkNinja promoted its product's quality at the false expense of competitor Dyson Inc.
-
April 26, 2017
Dyson Rival Gets Claims Trimmed From False Ad Suit
Vacuum maker SharkNinja got a false advertising lawsuit by rival Dyson trimmed Wednesday when an Illinois federal judge said there wasn't enough evidence for a reasonable jury to find SharkNinja made false claims that its vacuums were superior to Dyson's.