Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Audio MPEG, Inc. et al v. Dell, Inc., et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-00073
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker & Hostetler
- Charlson Bredehoft
- Finnegan
- Kaufman & Canoles
- Kellogg Hansen
- Law Offices of Charles B. Molster III
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 08, 2016
Winston & Strawn DQ'd From Audio Tech IP Suit
Winston & Strawn LLP was disqualified from defending Dell Inc. in a patent fight with a technology licensing company, a Virginia federal judge ruled Wednesday after questioning a Winston lawyer who once represented Dell's opponent in a case bringing similar infringement claims.
-
September 01, 2016
Winston & Strawn Says DQ From Dell IP Suit Isn't 'Sensible'
Winston & Strawn on Wednesday urged a Virginia federal judge not to disqualify it over a purported conflict of interest as counsel to Dell Inc. in a patent fight with a technology licensing company, saying disqualification is not required or "sensible."
-
August 23, 2016
Winston & Strawn Faces DQ Bid In Dell Audio Tech IP Suit
A technology licensing company suing Dell over alleged infringement of three audio compression patents asked a Virginia federal judge on Monday to disqualify Winston & Strawn LLP from representing Dell in the case, saying a partner at the firm previously represented the licensing company in similar matters regarding the patents at issue.