SAP America Inc v. InvestPic LLC

  1. October 29, 2021

    Shore Chan, Client Settle Atty Fee Dispute With Software Biz

    Shore Chan DePumpo LLP and a Dallas software company have settled their dispute over $680,000 in attorney fees levied against the law firm's former client in a financial data analysis patent lawsuit, the parties told a Texas federal judge.

  2. June 07, 2021

    Texas Software Biz Says Shore Chan Must Pay $680K Atty Fee

    Shore Chan DePumpo LLP's bid to escape liability for a $680,000 attorney fee award levied against its former client in a dispute over a financial data analysis patent is based on outdated precedent and should be denied, a Dallas software company told a Texas federal court.

  3. May 17, 2021

    Dallas Firm Says It Can't Be On Hook For $680K Atty Fee

    Shore Chan DePumpo LLP argued to a Texas federal judge that attorney immunity bars a claim that the firm is on the hook for a $680,000 attorney fee award levied against its former client, InvestPic, in a dispute over a financial data analysis patent.  

  4. December 07, 2018

    SAP Gets $680K In Atty Fees In Financial Data Patent Win

    A Texas federal judge has determined that SAP America Inc. is entitled to $679,000 in attorneys' fees racked up in a lawsuit challenging the validity of InvestPic LLC's financial data analysis patent, an award short of the $939,306 SAP had requested.

  5. September 07, 2017

    SAP Gets 'Exceptional' Case Atty Fees In Data Patent Win

    A Texas federal judge granted attorneys' fees to SAP America Inc. on Thursday after ruling its financial data analysis technology didn't infringe an InvestPic patent, finding the case was "exceptional" because InvestPic knew the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office thought its patent was weak and because of the subterfuge the company used to collect evidence.

  6. May 19, 2017

    SAP Gets Judge To Ax Financial Data Patent Under Alice

    A Texas federal judge ruled Thursday that a patent on a method of analyzing financial data asserted against SAP America Inc. is invalid for claiming only abstract ideas, a year after the Federal Circuit overturned a decision invalidating the patent on different grounds.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!