Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
September 29, 2016
In re Wells Fargo & Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Case Number:
3:16-cv-05541
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Arguedas Cassman
- Arnold & Porter
- Berger Montague
- Berman Tabacco
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Bottini & Bottini
- Bramson Plutzik
- Clarence Dyer & Cohen
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Farmer Brownstein
- Glancy Prongay
- Goodwin Procter
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
- Harwood Feffer
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Lieff Cabraser
- Ridley McGreevy
- Saxena White
- Shuman Glenn
- Skaggs Faucette
- Springer Ayeni
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Williams & Connolly
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
April 19, 2021
9th Circ. OKs $52M Fee For Attys In Wells Fargo Suit
The Ninth Circuit has affirmed a lower court's $52 million award to the legal team representing shareholders in a derivative action against the brass at Wells Fargo claiming they were responsible for employees creating unauthorized customer accounts to help meet aggressive sales goals.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login