Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Shops at Summerlin North, LP et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-02854
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
September 14, 2017
Loeb & Loeb Beats 'Classic Hot Potato' DQ Bid
Loeb & Loeb LLP didn't drop former client Howard Hughes Corp. like a "hot potato," according to a ruling Thursday by a California federal judge who found the firm's work for the property developer ended a year before Loeb took on another client that sued HHC.
-
January 13, 2017
Property Co. Says Loeb & Loeb Dropped It Like 'Hot Potato'
Property development company Howard Hughes Corp. told a California federal judge Thursday that Loeb & Loeb LLP can't represent Regal Cinemas in its suit alleging HHC pulled a bait-and-switch with a pair of movie theater leases because the law firm ditched HHC specifically to take the job with Regal.