Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-07001
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Foley & Lardner
- Forde & O'Meara
- Lathrop GPM
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Perkins Coie
- Pope McGlamry
- Robins Kaplan
- Sidley Austin
- Skaggs Faucette
- Walkup Melodia
- Ward and Smith
- White & Case
- Wilkinson Stekloff
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 11, 2017
Petsmart, Nestle Get Pet Food Antitrust Claims Shredded
A California federal judge Monday dismissed claims from pet owners alleging retailer PetSmart Inc. colluded with manufacturers such as Nestle Purina Petcare Co. to fix prices on prescription pet food by requiring a veterinarian's authorization to purchase the food.
-
May 16, 2017
PetSmart, Mars Pinning Pet Food Antitrust On FDA, Court Told
Consumers alleging PetSmart, Mars Petcare, Nestle Purina and others conspired to overprice pet food by marketing it as prescription-only argued Monday that the companies' "misleading and deceptive" dismissal bid introduced a new term to punt the blame to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
-
April 04, 2017
Pet Food Makers Look To Escape Prescription Antitrust Case
Mars, Nestle, PetSmart and others accused of fixing the prices of prescription pet food, after playing up their alleged health benefits, asked a California federal judge to dismiss the antitrust charges against them on Monday, arguing they are just following the law.
-
December 08, 2016
Nestle, Mars Face Antitrust Suit Over Prescription Pet Food
Mars, Nestle, PetSmart and others are accused of violating the Sherman Act for allegedly fixing the prices of prescription pet food that doesn't contain actual medicine, partially through the use of brand-owned clinics, according to a putative class action filed in California federal court on Wednesday.