Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Christina Grimm v. APN, Inc. et al
Case Number:
8:17-cv-00356
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
December 18, 2017
Stay In Rachael Ray Dog Food Suit 'Pointless,' Customer Says
A pet owner bringing a proposed class action accusing the maker of Rachael Ray Nutrish dog food of misrepresenting the product as "natural" urged a California federal court Monday not to pause the suit pending a potential decision by the California Department of Health about the term "natural," saying the proposed four-month delay would be "pointless."
-
April 25, 2017
Maker Of Rachael Ray's Dog Food Blasts 'Natural' Label Row
The manufacturer of celebrity cook Rachael Ray's dog foods urged a California federal judge Monday to toss a proposed class action alleging a slew of Nutrish items are falsely labeled as "natural," saying the labeling complies with the applicable guidelines and the ingredients complained about are actually vitamins.
-
March 01, 2017
Rachael Ray's Dog Food Slammed For False 'Natural' Labels
The company that sells celebrity chef Rachael Ray's dog food brand was slapped with a putative class action in California federal court Tuesday for false advertising over the "natural" labeling on Nutrish lines of dog food products when the items allegedly contain chemicals.