Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Apple Inc. et al v. Iancu
Case Number:
5:20-cv-06128
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
- Boies Schiller
- Dunlap Bennett
- Finnegan
- Flachsbart & Greenspoon
- Hudnell Law Group
- Knobbe Martens
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Perkins Coie
- White & Case
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- Cisco Systems Inc.
- Fitbit Inc.
- Google LLC
- Intel Corp.
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc.
- US Inventor
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 01, 2024
Apple, Intel Again Lose Fintiv APA Challenge In Calif. Court
A California federal judge on Sunday ended Big Tech's coordinated challenge to Patent Trial and Appeal Board precedent that allows its judges to discretionarily deny patent reviews based on how proposed reviews overlap with related litigation in other forums.
-
September 22, 2023
Patent Office Has Authority Over Petitions, Court Told
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has asked a federal court in California to rule the agency has the authority to tell patent judges what petitions they can take without having to go through the whole rulemaking process, seeking to sink a legal challenge from tech companies like Apple and Google.
-
August 18, 2023
Tech Giants, Edwards Lifesciences Fight Fintiv In Calif. Court
Several tech giants and artificial heart valve manufacturer Edwards Lifesciences have urged a California federal court to stop the Patent Trial and Appeal Board from denying patent petitions based on looming trial dates, about a week after two of those companies also raised the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
January 03, 2022
Patent Cases To Watch In 2022
The U.S. Supreme Court may consider whether a car part is a law of nature that can't be patented, and multiple courts are mulling the extent of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's discretionary powers. Here's what you need to know about these and other high-profile patent cases.
-
November 10, 2021
Fintiv Rule Fight To Continue After Tech Challenge Fails
The battle over Patent Trial and Appeal Board denials of patent reviews based on looming district court trials is far from over despite Wednesday's dismissal of a challenge by the tech industry, with the focus shifting to further appeals, potential legislation and the next patent office director.
-
November 10, 2021
Tech Giants Strike Out In Suit Attacking PTAB Denials
A California federal judge on Wednesday threw out a suit by Apple, Google and other tech companies challenging the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of denying patent reviews due to looming trials in district court, ruling the case is barred by the America Invents Act.
-
July 15, 2021
USPTO Says US Inventor's Fintiv Loss Also Hurts Tech Suit
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is trying to use a new Eastern District of Texas ruling to block Apple and others from challenging the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of denying patent reviews because of looming trials in parallel district court litigation.
-
July 07, 2021
5 Patent Cases To Watch In The Second Half Of 2021
The U.S. Supreme Court will be deciding later this year whether to take up a highly controversial patent eligibility case, while a California federal court mulls whether discretionary denial precedent at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is legal. Here are five cases in patent attorneys' sights for the rest of the year.
-
June 29, 2021
Tech Giants Say TransUnion Ruling Backs PTAB Review Fight
Apple and other tech giants have hit back at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's argument that a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling supports dismissing the companies' challenge of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of denying patent reviews based on parallel district court litigation, saying that the ruling actually favors them.
-
June 28, 2021
USPTO Cites TransUnion Ruling To Toss PTAB Reviews Suit
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is trying to use a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling to back its argument that Apple and others can't challenge the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of denying patent reviews because of looming trials in parallel district court litigation.