Shedding Light On Shady Grove: Rule 23 Trumps State Law

Law360, New York (July 21, 2015, 12:55 PM EDT) -- Some state consumer protection statutes provide a private cause of action, but expressly prohibit it from being pursued on behalf of a class. What happens when a claim under such a statute is pursued in federal court, where Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure expressly allows for class certification? This conundrum was addressed in a new opinion by the Eleventh Circuit in Lisk v. Lumber One Wood Preserving LLC, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11891 (11th Cir. July 10, 2015) that is likely to have significant ramifications around the country for cases involving similar state statutes....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!