NY Court Clarifies When Yellowstone Relief Is Appropriate

Law360, New York (October 9, 2014, 3:20 PM EDT) -- For years, practitioners have been confused by the New York Supreme Court's inconsistent position as to when a Yellowstone injunction is available in strict rental nonpayment cases. It has long been believed in New York that a Yellowstone injunction is not available in an action stemming from a default based solely upon the nonpayment of rent. However, the recent decision rendered and analysis proffered by Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead in Sagi Restaurant Corp. v. Brusco W. 78th St. LLC, No. 653992/2013, 2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 30626(U) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County Mar. 11, 2014) serves to debunk this notion....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!