Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Levick Strategic Communications
-
Misc | Filed: September 11, 2023 | Entered: September 11, 2023 Verschleiser v. Frydman et al
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | New York Southern
Mailing Receipt
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 121-123. Mailed to: Eli Verschleiser 1820 Avenue M. #718 Brooklyn, NY 11230. (sha)
-
Order | Filed: September 08, 2023 Verschleiser v. Frydman et al
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | New York Southern
Order
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 122 Memorandum Opinion & Order. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated September 7, 2023, all of the Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and, where applicable, Rule 9(b), are GRANTED. Likewise, the Rule 12(b)(2) motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as to Davis and the Levick Defendants are GRANTED. The pla intiff's request for leave to amend the complaint is DENIED, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 09/08/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of right to appeal) (nd)
-
Order | Filed: September 07, 2023 Verschleiser v. Frydman et al
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | New York Southern
Order
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 73 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Eric Lebson, Levick Strategic Communications, LP, 55 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by 500 Lincoln Owner LLC, Joe Levine, Monica Libin 2000 Irrevocable Tr ust, Monica Libin Frydman, Nicolae Constatinescu, Frydco Capital Group, LLC, Mercer Street Partners LP, Alexander Libin, Summer Investors LLC, Jacob Frydman 2000 Irrevocable Trust, Jacob Frydman, Winter Investors LLC, Jfurti, LLC, Le dgerock LLC, Craig Gould, 69 MOTION to Dismiss The Complaint. filed by Daniel Edelman, 95 MOTION to Dismiss . MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous . filed by Lanny Davis, 100 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by Andrew W. Hayes. The Court has considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, those arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, all of the defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and, where applicable, Rule 9(b), are granted. Likewise, the Rule 12(b)(2) motions to dismiss for lack of personal j urisdiction as to Davis and the Levick Defendants are granted. The plaintiff's request for leave to amend the complaint is denied, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the pro se plaintiff, to close all pending motions, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/7/2023) (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login