<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rsspretty.xsl' version='1.0'?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://www.law360.com/company_articles/2657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>Law360: McGinnis Lochridge</title>
    <link>http://www.law360.com/</link>
    <description>Latest articles for organization: McGinnis Lochridge</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2009 Portfolio Media, Inc.</copyright>
    <language>en-US</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Texas Court To Rehear Sabotage Case Against Exxon</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/135597</link>
      <description>The Texas Supreme Court has agreed to rehear a pair of linked cases that accuse Exxon Mobil Corp. of sabotaging certain oil wells in order to prevent other companies from drilling there. </description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/135597</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lin, Powerchip Resolve Patent Suit Over SDRAM</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/119686</link>
      <description>Lin Packaging Technologies Ltd. has reached a settlement with Powerchip Semiconductor Corp. in a suit accusing Powerchip and another defendant of infringing a patent covering computer chip technology.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/119686</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akin Gump Settles $72M Patent Malpractice Suit</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/119212</link>
      <description>Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP has decided to halt post-verdict squabbles over a $72.6 million legal malpractice award to a former client, reaching a confidential final settlement with plaintiffs Air Measurement Technologies Inc. and North-South Corp.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/119212</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akin Gump Fights Subpoenas In IP Malpractice Suit</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/109566</link>
      <description>Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP has asked a judge to enjoin subpoenas seeking its testimony in a post-verdict hearing related to a malpractice suit over botched technology patent applications, in which a jury returned a $72.6 million verdict against the firm.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/109566</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akin Wants $83M Bond Lowered In Malpractice Case</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/108213</link>
      <description>Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP has asked a judge to waive or reduce a requested supersedeas bond of more than $83 million in a dispute accusing it of gross malpractice and negligence over botched technology patent applications and related infringement litigation.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/108213</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$83M Bond Sought In Akin Gump Malpractice Case</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/106362</link>
      <description>Plaintiffs accusing Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP of gross malpractice and negligence have asked a judge to set a supersedeas bond of more than $83 million as post-verdict motions continue in a dispute over botched patent applications and related infringement litigation.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/106362</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akin Gump Faces $72.6M Patent Malpractice Verdict</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/100560</link>
      <description>A federal jury has returned a $72.6 million verdict against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP in a lawsuit accusing the firm of gross malpractice and negligence over botched patent applications connected to computerized warning systems for firemen and related infringement litigation. </description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/100560</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claim Deficiencies Doom Shareholders Suit V. Ramp</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/94434</link>
      <description>Finding that shareholders of now-defunct medical software maker Ramp Corp. failed to show that their securities claims were not derivative in nature and that they did not cure multiple deficiencies in their petition, a Texas appeals court has affirmed the dismissal of the investors' complaint.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/94434</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas High Court Spares Exxon $18M Jury Award</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/94404</link>
      <description>In two linked decisions, the Texas Supreme Court gave Exxon Mobil Corp. a big boost against owners and lessees of oil fields it formerly operated, reversing the appeals court&#8217;s support for an $18.7 million jury award to the landowners and nullifying Emerald Oil &amp; Gas Co. LC's claims that Exxon is liable for sabotaging the wells.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/94404</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judge Tosses Oil Antitrust Suits On Political Grounds</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/82774</link>
      <description>A federal judge has dismissed a consolidated class action and two other suits that accused Citgo Petroleum Corp. of furthering the anti-competitive practices of oil-producing countries, concluding that the allegations hinged on political issues that remain beyond the realm of the courts. </description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/82774</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>J&amp;J Racks Up $69M In Ortho Evra Settlements: Report</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/72304</link>
      <description>Johnson &amp; Johnson has reportedly racked up at least $68.7 million in its efforts to settle hundreds of lawsuits filed by women who suffered adverse effects after using the Ortho Evra birth control patch. </description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/72304</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5th Circ. Reinstates Contract Breached By Canon</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/64064</link>
      <description>Canon Inc.'s terminated patent license with Nano-Proprietary Inc. over flat-panel TV technology has been reinstated by a federal appeals court, which ruled that an &#8220;irrevocable&#8221; contract means exactly that, even though Canon was found to have breached the contract.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/64064</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suit Claims Botox Caused Injuries, Deaths</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/61777</link>
      <description>More than a dozen Botox users and their relatives filed suit Wednesday against drugmaker Allergan Inc., claiming that they had been injured or their relatives killed by the popular cosmetic drug, and that patients had not been adequately warned of the drug's dangers.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/61777</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FDA Precludes Expert Testimony On Ortho-Evra: J&amp;J</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/52542</link>
      <description>Johnson &amp; Johnson on Tuesday continued to fight plaintiffs' expert testimony in a multidistrict case over J&amp;J's popular birth control patch Ortho-Evra, asking to bar not only witnesses but whole lines of argument from expert testimony.
</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/52542</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>J&amp;J, Ortho-Evra Plaintiffs Duel Over Experts</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/52405</link>
      <description>Pharmaceutical giant Johnson &amp; Johnson and plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation alleging J&amp;J's popular birth control patch Ortho-Evra may increase users' risk of developing dangerous blood clots sparred over expert testimony on Monday, with each seeking to disqualify the other's witnesses.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/52405</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>J&amp;J Battles Consolidation Of Ortho-Evra Lawsuits</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/44968</link>
      <description>Pharmaceutical giant Johnson &amp; Johnson is fighting efforts to consolidate the bellwether trials in the multidistrict litigation over its popular birth control patch, Ortho-Evra, arguing commonalities in the cases are eclipsed by their idiosyncrasies.
</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/44968</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Appeals Court Refuses To Hear Mobil Dispute</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/39818</link>
      <description>A federal appeals court has denied a review of an appeal by Mobil Oil Corp. units contending that a district court erred by remanding a putative class action alleging breach of contract and fraud claims to state court.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/39818</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judge Upholds Injunction To Protect O2 Patents</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/32406</link>
      <description>A judge on Monday swatted down an attempt by Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd. to block the permanent injunction that capped a patent suit O2 Micro International Ltd. had filed against it over a power converting technology used in television monitors.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/32406</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>J&amp;J Resists Bid To Keep Ortho Evra Docs Secret</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/32302</link>
      <description>Johnson &amp; Johnson has fought a bid by plaintiffs to unseal millions of documents that have been produced in connection with the multidistrict product liability litigation over popular birth control patch Ortho Evra, arguing that the public dissemination of the information would prejudice the jury pool and cause &#8220;confusion and alarm&#8221; among patients.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/32302</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Canon Appeals Flat Screen TV Licensing Order</title>
      <link>http://www.law360.com/articles/25243</link>
      <description>Canon Inc. has appealed a district court decision that allowed patent holding company Nano-Proprietary Inc. to terminate a licensing agreement between the companies and to keep Canon&#8217;s original $5.5 million purchase price for licensing flat screen television technology.</description>
      <guid>http://www.law360.com/articles/25243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
