What Leegin's Conclusion Does (And Doesn't) Mean

Law360, New York (September 07, 2010, 11:36 AM ET) -- In its second encounter with PSKS Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Aug. 17 affirmed the dismissal on the pleadings of the plaintiff's antitrust claims for vertical minimum price-fixing, also known as resale price maintenance. This was a huge swing. In the first encounter in 2006, the court had summarily affirmed a large jury verdict in favor of PSKS based on the same claims.

However, in the interim the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required