Law360, New York (July 01, 2008, 12:00 AM ET) -- Despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., [1] the Third Circuit recently reversed a district court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of a truck manufacturer on a price-cutting dealer’s claim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
In Toledo Mack Sales & Service Inc. v. Mack Trucks Inc., [2] the dealer, Toledo Mack, alleged that Mack Trucks entered into a vertical agreement with other Mack dealers to facilitate the dealers’ horizontal agreement to maintain...
Post-Leegin Antitrust Law Definitions
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
