High Court Says It Shouldn't Have Taken Union Neutrality Case

Law360, New York (December 10, 2013, 11:15 AM ET) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that it should not have agreed to hear a union's appeal of an Eleventh Circuit ruling that an employer's agreement to remain neutral on union organizing could violate anti-bribery law, dismissing the case as improvidently granted.

The court's finding that it should not have agreed to consider Unite Here Local 355's appeal of an Eleventh Circuit ruling reviving a lawsuit brought by dog track worker Martin Mulhall leaves in place the appeals court's decision that that organizing assistance offered by an...
To view the full article, register now.