Differing, Changing Pleading Standards For FCA Suits

Law360, New York (September 16, 2014, 4:48 PM EDT) -- On Aug. 20, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the "worthless services" and "false certification" theories of liability under the False Claims Act, overturning a $9 million qui tam jury verdict. Two weeks later, the Eighth Circuit shed the pleading specificity requirements needed to sustain a lawsuit under the FCA. These two recent decisions highlight the difference among circuits in the way they treat FCA actions. While some courts are raising the bar on qui tam pleadings, other courts are making it easier to bring suit under the FCA....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!