Brady Ruling Is Sports Fan's Opinion, Not Legal Reasoning

Law360, New York (September 4, 2015, 4:56 PM EDT) -- When U.S. District Judge Richard Berman vacated the arbitration award that imposed a four-game suspension on Tom Brady, it marked the second time that the iconic quarterback persuaded a federal judge to fumble a legal ruling. In 2011, Brady was the lead plaintiff in an antitrust lawsuit against the NFL. The league had declared a bargaining impasse under the National Labor Relations Act, and locked out players in an effort to extract concessions. Undeterred, Brady and other NFL players sued the league in Minnesota's federal district court. In an opinion that faulted the NFL for exercising its rights to exert economic pressure on players, U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson concluded that "the threat of harm shown by the Brady Plaintiffs here, including lost playing time, constitutes irreparable harm."...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!