Baker & McKenzie LLP has nabbed two leading employment and competition attorneys from Linklaters LLP and Clifford Chance LLP for its Hong Kong office, the firm announced Monday.
The Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to pass on a Dollar General Corp. appeal that could limit tribal courts' jurisdiction over nonmembers, countering a banking group's contention that companies will avoid doing business with tribes if a decision against the retailer isn’t overturned.
The U.S. Department of Justice said Tuesday it has reached a settlement with Texas-based Culinaire International to resolve a claim that the catering and restaurant management company engaged in citizenship discrimination by unlawfully placing documentary burdens on its permanent resident employees.
A California federal judge has ruled that a certified class of Taco Bell Corp. workers failed to provide proof of a policy they allege denied the workers timely meal breaks, rejecting their request to find the fast-food chain liable for breaking state law.
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday upheld an Exxon Mobil Corp. plan that stripped a top executive of $5 million in nonvested stock rights when he joined a rival energy firm, paving the way for more employers to use incentive plans to keep top talent in place without running afoul of the state's noncompete laws.
A whistleblower who twice sued Verizon Communications Inc. under the False Claims Act for allegedly fraudulent billing practices asked the U.S. Supreme Court to consider a lower court’s dismissal of his second suit under the first-to-file bar provision, citing a circuit split and a dissent from D.C. Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan.
A California federal judge granted preliminary approval Friday to eBay Inc.’s $3.75 million settlement in state prosecutors’ case over eBay’s anti-competitive agreement not to poach Intuit Inc.’s workers, a sibling to the recently rejected $324.5 million class action deal between tech giants and Bay Area engineers.
A Florida appeals court has rejected the state attorney general's request to stay its appeals of two rulings overturning the state's same-sex marriage ban, instead consolidating and certifying them for consideration by the Florida Supreme Court.
The Texas Supreme Court said Friday that a legal recruiter’s former employer can be forced to remove allegedly defamatory Internet postings accusing him of bribing an associate at K&L Gates LLP, but the company cannot be prohibited from making similar statements in the future.
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday held that courts may set deadlines for objections to jury instructions, affirming a lower court’s order that found that a dredging vessel owner's objection to a jury instruction in a dispute over a worker's injury was untimely.
A California appeals court on Thursday affirmed a lower court’s decision to decertify a class of technicians in a suit brought against Comcast Corp. for allegedly overworking them and denying them meal and rest breaks, holding that data from a system for measuring the technicians’ time was unreliable.
More than Detroit’s financial future is at stake in the battle royale that will kick off Tuesday on the city’s proposed restructuring, attorneys say — it will also dictate how distressed municipalities nationwide can fix their lopsided balance sheets in the face of runaway pension costs.
A move by New York City leaders to mitigate pay cuts imposed on school bus drivers under less labor-friendly contracting rules by granting them $42 million is rankling spending watchdogs as well as contractors who won't accept the payout quietly, experts say.
In trumpeting its first-ever whistleblower award to a compliance and audit professional, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday also inadvertently disclosed information that could be used to determine the identity of a person who faced an enforcement action because of the whistleblower’s tip.
Following decisions in their favor, same-sex couples from Virginia and Oklahoma have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to review rulings that found against same-sex marriage bans in their states, saying the time is now to clarify whether those types of prohibitions are unconstitutional.
A contractor to the U.S. Department of Labor has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case arguing that the Missouri director of revenue wrongly counted a trust created for a deferred compensation plan as business income.
The U.S. Department of Justice is urging a California federal judge to reject free speech arguments advanced in a False Claims Act case by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, adding more fuel to a fiery debate surrounding punishment of off-label promotion.
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday granted conditional class certification in a suit alleging UnitedHealth Group Inc. improperly demanded reimbursement for overpaid claims, but the class lost a lead plaintiff after the judge reconsidered an earlier determination of the plaintiff's standing to sue.
The Eighth Circuit on Friday revived most of a former Planned Parenthood employee's whistleblower suit, breathing new life into allegations that the health care provider engaged in a multiyear scheme of submitting false Medicaid claims that resulted in inflated reimbursements.
Retailer Abercrombie & Fitch Co. on Friday reached a settlement in Ohio federal court with a shareholder who accused company directors including CEO Michael Jeffries of violating their fiduciary duties by failing to link CEO pay with performance and other lapses.
Companies doing business in Central America may want to pay attention to an approaching deadline in a labor law dispute between the United States and Guatemala over the country’s alleged failure to enforce its labor laws in the apparel, agricultural, and food processing industries, says Joseph Laroski, counsel with King & Spalding LLP and former associate general counsel in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
If a Texas appellate court had found the particular clauses of intent within a contractual agreement between independent representatives and their employer in Momentis U.S. Corp. v. Weisfeld insufficient for the purposes of contract formation then it would likely have undone the balance of online contracts, says Richard Raysman of Holland & Knight LLP.
Reports of the demise of corporate social responsibility may be greatly exaggerated. Those considering the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Hobby Lobby case would be wise to focus on the decision makers, not just the decision itself, says John Vail of Quarles & Brady LLP.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Prime Inc. demonstrates that the U.S. Supreme Court's eventual ruling in Mach Mining will be a game changer for employers since the EEOC's current position basically claims that courts should simply take the commission's word when its claimed to have negotiated in good faith, say Gerald Maatman Jr. and Howard Wexler of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.
If the Fourth Circuit's reasoning in Tatum v. RJR Pension Investment Committee is adopted elsewhere the case could substantially impact the future conduct of fiduciary breach litigation as well as plan practices in administering stock funds, say Myron Rumeld and Russell Hirschhorn of Proskauer Rose LLP.
While big data can help eliminate individual biases in an employer's hiring process, the potential for disparate impact litigation arising from data analytics is real and imminent — even a program that is neutral on its face could result in disparate impact on protected classes, says David Walton of Cozen O'Connor PC.
"If you follow the philosophy of saving everything you're just multiplying exponentially the costs and risks of litigation and investigations," says Robert Owen, partner in charge of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP's New York office and president of the Electronic Discovery Institute.
For companies with global operations, the Second Circuit's recent decision in Liu v. Siemens AG should provide at least some level of comfort that allegations by foreign employees regarding conduct exclusively outside the United States are outside the reach of Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provision, say attorneys with Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.
While New York plaintiff attorneys will likely continue to fit cases where a plaintiff does not fall or no object falls on him under Labor Law Section 240(1), Diaz v. Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. may serve as a basis to move for summary judgment in the event the evidence shows that an object neither fell nor was on a descent when injury occurred, says David Cost of Hiscock & Barclay LLP.
The Sixth Circuit's ruling in Killion v. KeHe Distributors should remind employers that they accept a risk — which is compounded by the threat of a collective action — whenever they treat an employee as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, says Chuck Mataya of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP.