Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Cannon & Dunphy
-
Filed: April 25, 2024 | Entered: April 25, 2024 Mitchell et al v. Mendoza et al
350(P.I.: Motor Vehicle) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time 18 is granted. Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) Defendants to serve answers to all currently outstanding discovery requests (including production of responsive documents) by May 10, 2024; (2) confer about the adequacy of each side's discovery responses by May 24, 2024; and (3) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant discovery responses as exhibits, by May 31, 2024. Mailed notice (Kim, Young) (Entered: 04/25/2024)
-
Motion | Filed: April 25, 2024 | Entered: April 25, 2024 Mitchell et al v. Mendoza et al
350(P.I.: Motor Vehicle) | Illinois Northern
Motion
MOTION by Defendants Jose A Mendoza, The Sygma Network, Inc. for extension of time to complete discovery
Presented before Magistrate Judge
(Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time)(Everden, Emily) (Entered: 04/25/2024) -
Filed: March 22, 2024 | Entered: March 22, 2024 Mitchell et al v. Mendoza et al
350(P.I.: Motor Vehicle) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the joint status report (R. 16), the parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) Defendants to serve interrogatories and requests to produce documents to Plaintiff Crystal Mitchell by March 29, 2024 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (2) serve answers to all currently outstanding discovery requests (including production of responsive documents) by April 26, 2024; (3) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by May 10, 2024; and (4) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant discovery responses as exhibits, by May 17, 2024. The court will review the status report and resolve written discovery issues identified in the status report. The court will not consider general objections to discovery requests when ruling on discovery issues. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 03/22/2024)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login