Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Danziger & Markhoff
-
Order | Filed: January 06, 2011 | Entered: January 06, 2011 Rispler et al v. Sol Spitz Co., Inc. Retirement trust et al
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. | New York Eastern
Order on Motion for TRO Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction
ORDER denying 232 Motion for TRO; denying 249 Motion for Preliminary Injunction - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, defendant's motion to enjoin the distribution of the retirement plan funds and vacate the Settlement Agreement in this matter is denied in its entirety. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a formal motion seeking an award of attorneys' fees for the time spent responding to this motion, the imposition of monetary sanctions against Mr. Spitz, and Rule 11 sanctions against his latest counsel for bringing the instant motion. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/6/2011. (Irizarry, Dora)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login