Prudential V. Wrynn: A Chance To Review Retaliatory Tax

Law360, New York (July 02, 2012, 12:58 PM ET) -- In Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Wrynn, No. 102267- 2011, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 22111 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Apr. 16, 2012), the Supreme Court, New York County, denied Prudential’s claim against the superintendent of the New York State Department of Insurance for a refund and credit against retaliatory tax.

Prudential claimed that an additional payment of the Article 33 franchise tax on insurance companies entitled it to a refund and credit against retaliatory tax arising in prior years.

In New York, the Insurance Department is...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required

Sections

Law Firms Mentioned

Companies Mentioned

Government Agencies Mentioned

Related Articles