A Florida federal judge on Wednesday reversed FEMA’s de-obligation of $21 million in rehabilitation funds for the Florida coast to repair canals and levees damaged from hurricanes in 2004 and 2005, saying the Stafford Act prohibits the federal agency from pulling the funds back.
A California appeals court on Wednesday revived a suit brought by trustees of the Western Asbestos Settlement Trust alleging California Insurance Guarantee Association breached its duty to cover underlying asbestos injury claims, finding the necessary events to trigger the statute of limitations have not occurred.
North River Insurance Co. on Wednesday told the Delaware Supreme Court that the Chancery Court erred by not enjoining Mine Safety Appliances Co., which faces myriad personal injury claims, from participating in coverage litigation in West Virginia or filing other coverage claims than what’s pending in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Oracle America Inc., which recently hit the state of Oregon with a breach of contract suit for allegedly continuing to use software developed by Oracle for the state’s Affordable Care Act exchange despite never having paid approximately $23 million in fees, has added a copyright claim to the suit.
The judge presiding over Detroit's bankruptcy on Wednesday gave Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. and several hedge funds a week to refashion their objections to the city’s debt restructuring after a onetime ally against the Chapter 9 plan dropped out.
A former judge in Florida's Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court has joined the JAMS Miami Resolution Center as an arbitrator, mediator and special master covering a variety of disputes, including in the employment, health care, insurance and entertainment sectors, the company announced Tuesday.
The insurance company founder accused of plotting to kill a prominent Delaware judge was charged with creating false documents, in an indictment unsealed Tuesday in Maryland federal court that seeks to recover over $100 million in premiums customers paid as a result of artificially inflated ratings.
A Florida appeals court on Wednesday affirmed a lower court's decision to abate and not dismiss a bad faith claim against Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, ruling that though the move barred Safeco from removing the case to federal court, the trial court complied with the law in its ruling.
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. on Monday pushed back against banks, insurers and other investors’ lawsuit against BNY as trustee of pools of poor-performing residential mortgage-backed securities, arguing that it is being accused of breaching duties that aren't in the pooling and servicing contracts.
A Texas federal judge refused on Wednesday to reconsider his decision not to hand an early win to OneBeacon Insurance Group Ltd. in its suit claiming it doesn’t have to defend law firm T. Wade Welch & Associates in an antitrust-related legal malpractice suit brought by Dish Network Corp.
A firm representing policyholders in Superstorm Sandy insurance litigation in New York federal court on Monday blasted attempts by the insurers' counsel to cease mediations to conduct more site inspections, saying the attempts amount to "erecting another road block" for the plaintiffs at taxpayers' expense.
An American International Group unit told California jurors Tuesday it didn't stiff a New York science center on Hurricane Sandy damage claims, saying a high deductible for named storms applies even though Sandy lost its name before the damage occurred because it had unleashed "a massive wall of water" days earlier.
BP PLC on Tuesday asked the Texas Supreme Court to find that it's entitled to claim $750 million under a Transocean Ltd. insurance policy for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, saying the policy doesn't incorporate a separate indemnity agreement that limits Transocean's liability for underwater pollution.
A New York federal judge ruled Monday that Affiliated FM Insurance Co. sufficiently proved it mistakenly set a $30 million coverage limit instead of $10 million in Cammeby's Management Co. LLC’s suit claiming it had been stiffed on coverage it was owed for Superstorm Sandy damage to a commercial complex it owns in Brooklyn.
The U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday passed a consolidated bill tweaking the Dodd-Frank Act to exempt insurers from the capital requirements that apply to banks and exempt existing collateralized loan obligations from the statute’s Volcker Rule, while also adjusting the regulatory definition of a “qualified mortgage.”
An Indiana appeals court upheld the largest defamation verdict in the state’s history on Tuesday in a lawsuit claiming State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. had a roofing contractor arrested for assisting homeowners after the insurer denied hundreds of claims from a 2006 hail storm.
A Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP attorney representing institutional investors against American International Group Inc. has asked a New York federal judge to extend the opt-out deadline until after the Supreme Court weighs in on whether a long-standing class action tolling provision should apply to certain securities suits.
New Jersey's attorney general moved Tuesday to sanction a doctor who brought suit alleging the state is unlawfully handing insurance fraud investigations off to insurers, saying the suit is frivolous and merely an attempt by the doctor to halt investigations into his wrongdoing.
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., on Monday urged the Seventh Circuit to revive his lawsuit targeting a rule that allegedly provides preferable treatment to certain congressional staffers for health care obtained under the Affordable Care Act, saying the lower court was wrong to find he lacked standing to bring the suit.
The Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled Tuesday that a lawsuit accusing Robb Leonard Mulvihill LLP and Erie Insurance Co. of investigating a Pittsburgh attorney on child molestation claims they knew were false was properly transferred out of the plaintiff’s chosen venue of Philadelphia.
A recently issued opinion from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General assented to a drug manufacturer’s online discount program for branded drugs, making discount and referral arrangements less likely to raise concerns when they avoid federal reimbursement systems, say Stephanie Trunk and Brian Schneider of Arent Fox LLP.
"If you follow the philosophy of saving everything you're just multiplying exponentially the costs and risks of litigation and investigations," says Robert Owen, partner in charge of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP's New York office and president of the Electronic Discovery Institute.
The Connecticut Supreme Court's ruling in Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America v. The Netherlands Insurance Company is significant because it broadens an insurer’s ability to bring a declaratory judgment action against a mutual insurer to determine the existence or allocation of a duty to defend a common insured, say Dennis Brown and Thomas Blatchley of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP.
Thus far, the insurance industry has had the upper hand in cases involving unclaimed property audits and market conduct examinations, and recent appellate rulings in Florida and Kentucky are only the most recent in a series of victories for life insurers, say attorneys at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP.
Because there are no current regulations addressing the federal income tax accounting treatment of hedges of guaranteed minimum benefits, a recent directive offers useful guidance that likely will reduce the amount of resources spent by both the IRS and insurance companies on auditing and resolving issues, say William Pauls and Christopher Schoen of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP.
To this day, I have yet to see a litigation hold letter that was written by someone who understands the realities of how a business is actually run. In-house counsel cannot issue decrees to business units that read like they are issued by the king to his subjects, says Francis Drelling, in-house counsel at Specialty Restaurants Corp.
Because Brazil does not have a developed body of law on issues like business interruption, it is critical to work with experts that have local experience, especially when, in the absence of legal precedent, their analysis is likely to become the basis for resolution of a claim, say Jose Umbert and Jason Reeves of Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP and Pablo Hanna of Kincaid Mendes Vianna Advogados.
On average, a legal professional forwards content to 14 different people per week. Yet many attorneys and staff lack an understanding of copyright and their firm’s specific policies regarding shared third-party materials, says Roy Kaufman of Copyright Clearance Center.
MacRae v. HCR Manor Care Services could be seen as helpful to professional liability insurers because it makes the applicable standard for nursing hours per patient day clear, while also making it more difficult for residents to assert class action claims against these type of facilities, say James Koelzer and Charles Cannizzaro of Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP.
Read together, two recent California appellate court cases deal a powerful blow to providers attempting to extract fully billed charges from payors when patients are forced to, or unwittingly, seek medical services out of network, say Edward Stumpp and Jonathan Sandler of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP.