Law360, New York (July 23, 2014, 10:38 AM EDT) -- Since inter partes review proceedings were made available in 2012, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has received more than 1,200 petitions, and post-grant review proceedings have become, more than ever, de rigeur.[1] Evidence that the patent office has granted a petition for post-grant review (or, in some instances, has canceled claims) is exactly the type of evidence that accused infringers would relish to put before a jury to rebut not only the patentee's assertions of patent validity, but also claims of willful and induced infringement. However, until recently, courts have routinely excluded post-grant review evidence from jury trials, either as irrelevant or as more prejudicial than probative under Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
