How Fed. Circ. Should Address Plague Of Over-Redactions

Law360, New York (December 11, 2014, 10:27 AM EST) -- Judges and panels of the Federal Circuit frequently express frustration with litigants who over-redact "confidential" material in their briefs. Judge Timothy Dyk has referred to the practice as "an absolute plague."[1] The court's practice notes state that "[u]nnecessarily designating material in the briefs and appendix as confidential may hinder the court's preparation and issuance of opinions."[2] A 2011 panel opinion imposing sanctions for excessive confidentiality designations stated that that practice "ignores the requirements of public access, deprives the public of necessary information, and hampers this court's consideration and opinion writing."[3]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!