Expert Analysis

• ITC Ban On Apple Watch Could Still Be Reversed

  

  The U.S. International Trade Commission's recent final decision that the Apple Watch infringed two patents owned by Masimo Corp. was a rare instance of a popular consumer product being hit with an absolute importation ban, but it's possible that President Joe Biden could assert his power to reverse the ITC decision, says Benjamin Horton at Marshall Gerstein.

• Examining US And Europe Patent Disclosure For AI Inventions

  

  As applicants before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the European Patent Office increasingly seek patent protection for inventions relating to artificial intelligence, the applications may require more implementation details than traditional computer-implemented inventions, including disclosure of data and methods used to train the AI systems, say attorneys at Finnegan.

• Unlocking Value In Carve-Out M&A Transactions

  

  Some of the largest mergers and acquisitions in 2023 were carve-out transactions, and despite their unique intricacies and challenges, these transactions offer both buyers and sellers the opportunity to generate outsized returns in an otherwise vigorously competitive landscape, when carefully planned and diligently executed, say Kevin Crews and Rami Totari at Kirkland.

• Incontinence Drug Ruling Offers Key Patent Drafting Lessons

  

  In a long-awaited decision in Astellas v. Teva and Sandoz, an English court found that the patent for a drug used to treat overactive bladder syndrome had not been infringed, highlighting the interaction between patent drafting and litigation strategy, and why claim infringement is as important a consideration as validity, says George McCubbin at Herbert Smith.

• How Justices Could Rule On A Key Copyright Statute

  

  Attorneys at Manatt discuss how the U.S. Supreme Court may choose to address a fundamental accrual issue in Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, which precedents the court may look to in analyzing the issue and the challenges copyright claimants may face going forward.

• Fed. Circ. Elekta Holding May Make Patent Prosecution Harder

  

  The Federal Circuit's recent analysis of obviousness in its Elekta v. Zap Surgical Systems decision will make prosecuting patents harder, as parties will now need to consider whether to argue that cited patents are nonanalogous, say Sean Murray and Jeremiah Helm of Knobbe Martens.

• Attorneys, Law Schools Must Adapt To New Era Of Evidence

  

  Technological advancements mean more direct evidence is being created than ever before, and attorneys as well as law schools must modify their methods to account for new challenges in how this evidence is collected and used to try cases, says Reuben Guttman at Guttman Buschner.

• Knicks Suit Shows Need For Leagues To Protect Big Data

  

  The New York Knicks' recent lawsuit alleging a former employee took trade secrets to the Toronto Raptors shows sports leagues — both professional and amateur — should prepare for future litigation in this realm, given the growth of analytics and statistics in front offices, says Kevin Paule at Hill Ward Henderson.

• As AI Proliferates, Courts Are Tasked With Copyright Issues

  

  AI-generated works are raising a number of novel and important questions around registrability and copyright infringement liability, testing the U.S. Copyright Office's recently expressed view that U.S. law only protects human-authored material in cases nationwide, say Paul Llewellyn and Thomas Bird at Arnold & Porter.

• Tips For Litigating Against Pro Se Parties In Complex Disputes

  

  Litigating against self-represented parties in complex cases can pose unique challenges for attorneys, but for the most part, it requires the same skills that are useful in other cases — from documenting everything to understanding one’s ethical duties, says Bryan Ketroser at Alto Litigation.

• EPO Decision Significantly Relaxes Patent Priority Approach

  

  In a welcome development for patent applicants, a recent European Patent Office decision redefines the way that entitlement to priority is assessed, significantly relaxing the previous approach and making challenges to the right to priority in post-grant opposition proceedings far more difficult, say lawyers at Finnegan.

• Risks Of Oversimplifying Claimed Inventions In AI And Beyond

  

  Xin Shao at F. Chau & Associates discusses the risks of oversimplifying claimed inventions in AI and machine learning, especially in dynamic technological areas where popular narratives can overshadow real-world experience in shaping the legal framework.

• How Cos. Can Mitigate IP Risks After NY Labor Law Updates

  

  A recent New York labor law amendment limits the permissible scope of invention assignment agreements, leading to potential intellectual property risks for New York-based employers, which they can reduce through several steps, including the reevaluation of assignment provisions in employment agreements, say attorneys at Crowell & Moring.

• Get Ready For Calif.'s Expanded Restrictive Covenant Ban

  

  California recently passed the second of two new laws that together largely prohibit restrictive covenants, even for certain out-of-state employers — and since there's not much time before the statutes become effective, now is the time for companies to revisit how their confidential information will be protected, says Russell Beck at Beck Reed.

• The Murky World Of IP Protection For Gene-Edited Plants

  

  The recently filed Corteva v. Inari lawsuit, which accuses a plant trait developer of using a front company for commercial development, underscores the legal challenges in protecting and determining the ownership of new, genetically edited plant varieties, and emphasizes why joint development arrangements must be carefully navigated, say Andrew Zappia and Tate Tischner at Troutman Pepper.