Brulotte Rule Upheld Despite Suspect Economic Rationale

Law360, New York (June 23, 2015, 6:01 PM EDT) -- On June 22, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment Inc., maintaining the long-standing rule that a patent licensing agreement is per se unenforceable when it requires royalty payments for use after the expiration date of the underlying patent. The court's decision thus maintains a bright-line rule at the expense of depriving even commercially sophisticated parties of the flexibility to structure licensing arrangements so that royalty payments are spread to periods after the expiration of the subject patent....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!