An union representing employees at New Jersey's Trump Taj Mahal urged a Delaware bankruptcy judge Wednesday to reject a motion aimed at controlling its communications with casino customers, saying the relief sought by Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. violates the Constitution and federal labor law.
A New Jersey federal judge on Wednesday declined to partially convert a 15-month prison sentence for Teresa Giudice, the “Real Housewives of New Jersey” star convicted on fraud and tax evasion charges, saying the court didn't intend for Giudice to serve time in a halfway house.
The Third Circuit on Tuesday upheld a lower court's decision to transfer a complicated settlement dispute involving Norton Rose Fulbright, investment firm Greenlight Capital Inc., a group of insolvent Virgin Islands telecommunications firms and others to bankruptcy court, which then recommended that the case be thrown out.
Hollister Co. on Tuesday urged a New Jersey appellate panel to overturn a lower court's certification of a class alleging the clothing retailer duped customers with promotional gift cards with an inconspicuous expiration date, arguing the class members can't be ascertained.
McCarter & English LLP has snagged the chief counsel for the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities as it continues to strengthen its position in the energy arena, the firm said Thursday.
The Medicines Co. has slapped Fish & Neave LLP and Ropes & Gray LLP with a legal malpractice suit in New Jersey claiming Fish & Neave blew the deadline for a critical patent filing associated with the company's anticoagulant drug Angiomax.
Drug buyers on Tuesday urged a New Jersey federal judge to allow them to amend their complaint against Wyeth Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. over a no-authorized-generic deal for antidepressant Effexor XR, saying the court’s new pleading standard is novel and was only introduced after they filed their suit.
A former project manager convicted of taking $1.5 million in kickbacks for rigging bids and other Superfund site subcontracting abuses was ordered to pay $4.36 million in restitution by a New Jersey federal court on Tuesday, the largest fine imposed to date for the scheme.
New Jersey's failure to adopt new affordable housing regulations is a win for critics who say the proposal lowballs housing needs, but it also puts the state on a collision course with a court-ordered deadline and may ultimately require legislative reforms, experts said Tuesday.
The former CEO of a New Jersey pharmacy dispensing company was indicted on Tuesday by a federal grand jury for allegedly filing falsified income tax returns to conceal stock earnings, settlements and disbursements of company funds.
Attorney Louis Freeh, whose firm independently investigated Penn State University's child abuse scandal, urged the Third Circuit on Monday to declare his right to remove ex-Penn State chief Graham Spanier's forthcoming libel suit to federal court, arguing a looming deadline could constrain his litigation options.
California-based Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Inc. said Tuesday it will pay $135 million for five medical office buildings in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Kentucky, in a move intended to bolster the real estate investment trust’s health care holdings in growing urban markets.
Hunter Laboratories LLC on Monday couldn't dodge a contract suit brought by partners in a litigation sharing deal who were allegedly denied their share of proceeds from a $241 million False Claims Act recovery, with a New Jersey federal judge ruling his court is a proper venue.
The Third Circuit on Tuesday refused to revive a putative class action accusing GlaxoSmithKline PLC of violating the warranty on its diabetes drug Avandia, ruling a label declaring the drug “safe and effective” was not enough to create a warranty under New Jersey law.
A New Jersey federal judge overseeing multidistrict litigation over whether Pfizer Inc. conspired to bar competition for its epilepsy treatment Neurontin and promoted off-label uses on Monday appointed a special master to handle a dispute over attorneys' fees between opt-out plaintiff Walgreen Co. and class counsel.
Staples Inc. said late Monday that it is investigating “a potential issue involving credit card data,” amid reports that the retailer has become the latest company to have its customers' data hacked.
A New Jersey federal judge refused Monday to grant a preliminary injunction to a slot machine maker alleging its former in-house counsel defected with its trade secrets to start his own company, saying it waited too long to request relief.
A coalition of New Jersey municipal workers’ unions urged the state’s Supreme Court on Monday to reanimate formal disputes filed against three boroughs that imposed mandatory furloughs without first negotiating with the unions, telling the justices the appellate court’s ruling ignored clear precedent.
A New Jersey bankruptcy judge on Monday formally rebuffed a motion to invalidate the auction of Atlantic City’s bankrupt Revel Casino Hotel, dismissing a losing bidder’s claims of a tainted auction days after the bidder filed notice of appeal.
A New Jersey federal judge on Monday threw out a Wyndham Worldwide Corp. shareholder's derivative action over a series of security breaches, finding no evidence that Wyndham's Kirkland & Ellis LLP attorneys had a conflict of interest when they advised it to reject shareholder demands.
The Nevada federal court's recent ruling in Agincourt Gaming LLC v. Zynga Inc. is an important reminder that a nonparty wanting to challenge a civil subpoena should consider carefully the appropriate jurisdiction in which to file a motion to quash under recently enacted Rule 45, say Steven Luxton and Brad Nes of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced a modest change in its waiver-of-appeal policies. But, as shown in a recent Third Circuit case that severely penalized a defendant who appealed in the face of an unconditional waiver, the DOJ must revisit the entire question of demanding appeal waivers as a condition of a defendant being allowed to plead guilty, says Alain Leibman, a partner with Fox Rothschild LLP and former federal prosecutor.
The Third Circuit's recent ruling in Williams v. BASF Catalysts could prove an instructive example of how litigation may unfold when fraud and spoliation claims are brought against industrial manufacturers and their successors linked to asbestos-related illnesses and deaths, says Jesse Morris of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.
Fifty years ago, Justice Felix Frankfurter cautioned courts about getting mired in the “political thicket” of redistricting. In agreeing to hear Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court could be about to take a big step further into that thicket, says Michael Li, counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, NYU School of Law.
There is an inherent tension between the process of preparing a corporate representative to testify and the protections usually afforded by attorney-client privilege. Judicial decisions addressing these tensions are limited and, as of yet, the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals do not appear to have weighed in on these issues in any meaningful way, say Vanessa Miller and Nicholas Ellis of Foley & Lardner LLP.
Shareholders of financially troubled S corporations may now be able to avoid the flow-through of taxes when the S corporation or its subsidiary files bankruptcy, thanks to a Third Circuit ruling in the Chapter 11 case of Majestic Star Casino LLC. The losers are the corporation’s unsecured creditors, says Chad Coombs of Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP.
Both Huggins v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. and Duffy v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London offer lessons for policyholders — they should seek the broadest coverage possible and look to hold their brokers liable when failing to provide the coverage originally promised, say attorneys at Anderson Kill PC.
If the U.S. Supreme Court applies strict scrutiny in Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar to strike down reasonable restrictions on judicial campaign activity, the increasing flood of judicial campaign spending may further damage the public’s eroding confidence in the judiciary, says Matthew Menendez, counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, NYU School of Law.
The Third Circuit’s recent decision in Allen v. Advanced Telecommunication Network Inc. may have significant ramifications for future litigation over the scope of an “estate” as it potentially creates a disjunction between otherwise identical court recovery orders and judgments, say Steven Wilamowsky and Alix Brozman of Bingham McCutchen LLP.
The New Jersey Supreme Court's recent decision in IMO Industries Inc. v. Transamerica Corp. underscores the continued applicability of the court's observation on environmental coverage law with respect to allocation — just as one important issue is resolved at least two new issues rise to take its place, says Scott Seaman of Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP.