Bridgegate-inspired legislation in New Jersey that would enhance whistleblower safeguards for government workers could inject new confusion into the state's formidable Conscientious Employee Protection Act and expose public employers to an onslaught of frivolous litigation over legal conduct, some defense attorneys worry.
Dollar General Corp. on Friday pushed back the deadline for its $9.1 billion offer for Family Dollar Stores Inc. until Dec. 31, keeping up its campaign to scuttle a rival deal worth $8.5 billion that would merge the target with a third discount retailer.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey has agreed to rule on the constitutionality of recalling judges older than the statutorily mandated retirement age in an appeal from a defendant who said his criminal trial was officiated by a judge whose age barred his service.
Fleischer Fleischer & Suglia and one of its partners were disqualified from a derivative shareholder suit accusing an insurance brokerage of defaulting on loans, according to a New Jersey Superior Court order filed last week, due to the firm's past representation of the brokerage.
Hanover Insurance Co. has been hit with a $1.5 million suit in New Jersey federal court by a company that claims the insurer unfairly denied its claim for damage resulting from Superstorm Sandy and then hired an attorney who badgered the company’s owner and called him an “idiot.”
A New Jersey state judge on Wednesday ruled against the retailer-owned cooperative that operates ShopRite Supermarkets, supporting Lexington Insurance Co.'s application of a $22 million “named storm” deductible on a $54 million Superstorm Sandy damages claim and refusing the cooperative's argument for a lower deductible.
In an effort to bolster its solar capabilities, SunEdison Inc. subsidiary TerraForm Power Inc. has agreed to buy a portfolio of solar energy assets from Swiss asset manager Capital Dynamics for about $250 million, the companies said late Wednesday evening.
Nestle SA-owned Gerber Product Co. was hit with a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday in New Jersey federal court alleging the company deceptively marketed its “Good Start Gentle” brand of infant formula as having allergy-reducing properties despite lacking adequate scientific proof.
Diagnostic radiology network Atlantic Imaging Group LLC sued the onetime counsel and others associated with a New Jersey medical testing business for fraud, contending it was a victim of misrepresentations, omissions and diverted funds intended to hide the company's financial woes and hinder creditors.
Biomet Inc. will pay $6 million to resolve a whistleblower’s False Claims Act suit in New Jersey federal court alleging that it showered doctors' office staff with kickbacks to encourage use of bone-growth stimulators and improperly billed Medicare for refurbished medical devices, the U.S. Department of Justice said Wednesday.
An unnamed investor holding senior debt in Caesars Entertainment Corp.’s largest subsidiary has pulled out of negotiations around the seemingly inevitable restructuring of the casino operator’s balance sheet, according to a Wednesday securities disclosure.
Real estate mogul Donald Trump took aim Wednesday at the Chapter 11 plan disclosure statement for the casino operator that bears his name, arguing that Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. doesn't reveal what it plans to do if it loses a court battle over use of the moniker.
A New Jersey appellate panel on Wednesday upheld an arbitration award assessed to Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., denying an animal rescue charity’s request for over $10 million in punitive damages and attorneys’ fees stemming from overcharges on brokerage accounts.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. urged the Third Circuit on Tuesday not to revive a suit over a no-authorized-generic deal between the company and GlaxoSmithKline PLC regarding Lamictal, claiming that dismissals in other antitrust cases support the notion that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Actavis ruling has limited reach.
A New Jersey state lawmaker on Tuesday announced the introduction of a bill that would more than double the exclusion threshold for the state’s tax on estates to $1.5 million and eliminate the state’s inheritance tax for some family members.
Spectra Energy Operating Co. LLC on Tuesday was hit with an $8 million environmental contamination suit in New Jersey federal court, with 25 plaintiffs claiming Spectra’s negligence in laying a gas pipeline led to soil and water contamination during Superstorm Sandy.
New Jersey has granted its first application under a controversial program allowing exceptions to environmental regulations, finding that strictly enforcing state recycling rules when it comes to defense contractor Exelis Inc.'s shredding of hard drives that contain classified information would be unduly burdensome.
An attorney for plaintiffs suing over a 2012 derailment and chemical spill in Paulsboro, New Jersey, whom Consolidated Rail Corp. accuses of violating a protective order urged a New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday not to sanction him, saying the accusation was “baseless and hypocritical.”
Forty former Resorts Casino Hotel cocktail servers have settled their age discrimination suit in New Jersey state court against the Atlantic City, New Jersey, casino over their 1920s-themed flapper uniforms, the plaintiffs' counsel confirmed on Wednesday.
Despite plans to build an office of its own, Prudential Financial Inc. has re-upped at the Three Gateway Center in Newark, New Jersey, the company confirmed Wednesday, signing a deal to maintain about 300,000 square feet of office space.
Despite what you may have read elsewhere, the fact that U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp's brother once played in the NFL is of no legal consequence to Judge Shipp presiding over a New Jersey lawsuit involving the NFL. However, his brother's apparent ambition to become an NFL coach creates at least the appearance of a conflict of interest, says Daniel Wallach of Becker & Poliakoff PA.
An employee has just returned from a trip to West Africa. Can you require him to stay home, essentially quarantined, for 21 days? This is just one scenario in which fears of Ebola may implicate an employer's obligations under a number of laws — not least of which are disability discrimination laws prohibiting differential treatment based on a perception of someone's physical condition, say attorneys with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP.
Less than 48 hours before Monmouth Park Racetrack was to open the first legal sports book in New Jersey, U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp put a temporary halt to those plans. Oral argument on the leagues’ application for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for Nov. 20. Can we expect a different outcome? Don’t bet on it, says Daniel Wallach of Becker & Poliakoff PA.
As our legal system evolves and we understand more about how an effective court system should function, the role of alternative dispute resolution should also shift. For example, the growth of e-discovery — and the ballooning associated costs — has further pushed the special-master trend, say former U.S. Magistrate Judge John Hughes and former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Maria Sypek of JAMS.
As conscientious professionals who are required to address problems with notoriously elusive dimensions, lawyers should consider securing second opinions in a much wider array of circumstances than has been the norm, says Judge Wayne Brazil, a neutrual with JAMS and former magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Notwithstanding its arguably questionable precedential support, the Third Circuit’s decision in Opalinski v. Robert Half Inc. is not surprising. It continues arbitration law’s march toward a likely end, by any path, for class action liability for companies and other business entities, say Brian Berkley and Matthew Adler of Pepper Hamilton LLP.
Adding to its recent trend of case law raising the bar for plaintiffs seeking class certification, the Third Circuit's ruling in Grandalski v. Quest Diagnostics Inc. will make it even more difficult for consumers to gain certification of multistate classes when state law claims are being asserted, say Burt Rublin and Joel Tasca of Ballard Spahr LLP.
The Nevada federal court's recent ruling in Agincourt Gaming LLC v. Zynga Inc. is an important reminder that a nonparty wanting to challenge a civil subpoena should consider carefully the appropriate jurisdiction in which to file a motion to quash under recently enacted Rule 45, say Steven Luxton and Brad Nes of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced a modest change in its waiver-of-appeal policies. But, as shown in a recent Third Circuit case that severely penalized a defendant who appealed in the face of an unconditional waiver, the DOJ must revisit the entire question of demanding appeal waivers as a condition of a defendant being allowed to plead guilty, says Alain Leibman, a partner with Fox Rothschild LLP and former federal prosecutor.
The Third Circuit's recent ruling in Williams v. BASF Catalysts could prove an instructive example of how litigation may unfold when fraud and spoliation claims are brought against industrial manufacturers and their successors linked to asbestos-related illnesses and deaths, says Jesse Morris of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.