Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey and counsel for a class of health care service providers have urged the Third Circuit to preserve a class action settlement resolving claims over unpaid reimbursements, saying the deal provides the best solution to the dispute, even for the objectors who appealed.
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday transferred to California an Amtrust at Lloyd's Ltd. suit against a former University of Southern California football player who is seeking coverage for lost potential NFL earnings, saying the Golden State would be a more convenient venue.
A New Jersey real estate developer has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review its appeal of a New Jersey trial court ruling that was denied certification by the state's high court, saying it has been denied due process and $60 million in compensation for the taking of its land.
A New Jersey federal judge halted discovery Friday in a landfill owner's suit alleging a state environmental regulator illegally conspired to seize the property, after the company argued it has the right to refuse discovery questions because of a state grand jury investigation.
The New Jersey General Assembly unanimously approved a bill Thursday 73-0 that would limit access to data from recording devices in automobiles that capture information about the driver's activity to car owners and certain qualified individuals and officials.
Atlantic City’s defunct Revel Casino Hotel has chosen to stick with a proposed $82 million Chapter 11 sale to Florida real estate tycoon Glenn Straub, according to court papers filed Thursday in support of a deal rejected once before by the presiding bankruptcy judge.
The New Jersey Appellate Division on Friday upheld a $1.6 million verdict for a man who claimed he contracted mesothelioma from asbestos-contaminated talc used to make Old Spice and Desert Flower talcum powder and brought home on his father's clothing from work.
A New Jersey federal judge refused on Wednesday to dismiss a suit accusing investment giant BlackRock Inc. of charging two mutual funds excessive advisory fees, finding the funds adequately pled claims that they were charged $280 million more per year than subadvised funds for similar services.
The Third Circuit in a precedential opinion on Thursday denied a withholding of removal request by a gay Honduran national who says that he fears torture and death by the infamous Mara Salvatrucha gang, ruling that the gang was interested in his money and recruitment potential and not in harming him on account of his homosexuality.
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday granted Volvo Car Corp.'s bid for nearly $1 million in attorneys’ fees in a suit accusing the automaker of ripping off a child safety seat patent, saying there was no “reasonable basis" for the suit to have been filed because the products differ heavily.
The New Jersey Assembly on Thursday approved two measures related to the state's controversial $225 million settlement with Exxon Mobil Corp. over refinery pollution, calling for an extension to the public notice period and a requirement that half the settlement amount be allocated to restoration and cleanup.
A ruling that insurance policy limits on flooding don't apply to more than $500 million in Hurricane Sandy damages suffered by Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. could aid the legal arguments of other insureds seeking bigger recoveries and lessen the storm's impact on ratepayers, experts say.
The New Jersey General Assembly passed a bill Thursday that would create an Urban Enterprise Zone in Atlantic City for the next 10 years, permitting businesses other than casinos to offer a reduced sales tax to encourage business growth and help stimulate the city's struggling economy.
The Third Circuit on Thursday concluded that "insured property" as it appears in a Standard Flood Insurance Policy doesn't include land, affirming that an SFIP issued to two homeowners doesn’t cover the cost of removing debris they didn't own that was deposited on their land during Hurricane Sandy.
A New Jersey federal judge said Thursday he doesn't have jurisdiction to hear a strange trademark suit between the state's highway authority and a small Florida pizza chain, rejecting the claim that a truck full of aid sent north during Hurricane Sandy does the trick.
Shareholders accusing Merck & Co. Inc.'s former vice president of lying about the study results on Vioxx's heart attack link told a New Jersey federal court Wednesday that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Omnicare ruling "vindicates" their case theory and directly rejects the executive's summary judgment argument.
In light of a recent state-sponsored report outlining Atlantic City, New Jersey's troubled financial condition, credit rating agency Moody's Investor Services Inc. issued comments Wednesday saying it believes the proposals made for recovery are credit negative because they leave open the possibility of a default.
The Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor has urged the Third Circuit to uphold a lower court ruling finding the commission did not interfere with unions’ collective bargaining when it changed the hiring process for certain workers, saying the lower court properly upheld the commission’s authority to regulate labor.
A federal judge in New Jersey dismissed an antitrust suit brought by charity hospital Deborah Heart and Lung Center against two other medical centers, ruling Deborah failed to prove allegations the defendants tried to edge the hospital out of the market for cardiac patients.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was criticized by immigrant rights supporters Wednesday who said he betrayed them by quietly signing onto an amicus brief with three other state governors urging the Fifth Circuit to uphold an injunction against President Barack Obama’s recent executive actions on immigration.
Despite the decision in Rodriguez v. Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection, the Third Circuit’s ruling was very narrow and leaves a door open for future challenges to state trade secret protections for hydraulic fracturing companies when it comes to medical care carveouts, says Emily Thomas of Baker & Hostetler LLP.
Although no court has fully addressed the lawfulness of employers using voice over Internet protocol services to record all employee phone calls under federal and state laws, courts will likely apply the same framework used to examine the lawfulness of traditional telephone recordings, says James McCabe of Troutman Sanders LLP.
What will spring bring for the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation? Will it continue to close the door on new MDL proceedings? Will it decide to throw the baby out with the bathwater and decline to create a baby wipe MDL? asks Alan Rothman of Kaye Scholer LLP.
This week both chambers begin the annual congressional budget debate, a process that will set the budget rules and spending limits for the congressional appropriations committees in funding federal agencies for fiscal year 2016. And on Thursday, the Senate will begin its famed “Vote-a-rama,” say Richard Hertling and Kaitlyn McClure of Covington & Burling LLP.
Practitioners should take note of the New Jersey Supreme Court's recent decision in Townsend v. Pierre when seeking to exclude expert testimony that is based on factual scenarios that have no support in the record, says Timothy Freeman of Sedgwick LLP.
Even as the Delaware appraisal rights landscape continues to evolve, deal makers should avoid assuming that the issues and outcomes will be the same in transactions involving companies incorporated in other states. The relevant statutory regime, as well as the judicial fair-value exercise, may produce unexpected results, say attorneys with Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
The Third Circuit recently waded into the ongoing debate over the ownership of tax refunds generated by a failed bank in FDIC receivership but paid to a failed bank holding company due to the existence of a tax sharing agreement. The decision deepens the circuit court divide regarding this issue, which will likely need to be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court, say Andrew Silfen and Jeffrey Rothleder of Arent Fox LLP.
Although court decisions are public records, that doesn’t mean they should be publicized by the courts on search engines, such as Google. Access alone isn’t the problem. The issue is that these decisions appear prominently atop search results — even when browsing parties are not looking for them. Courts have opened their doors, but they need not remove them entirely, says Adam Sherman of Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP.
The recent introduction of a Connecticut data encryption bill modeled in part after the New Jersey law adopted in January is likely an early indication of a legislative trend in which other states will enact legislation to improve protection of personal information and the prevention and mitigation of unauthorized data breaches exposing their residents’ personal information, say attorneys with Day Pitney LLP.
Just in time for St Patrick’s Day, Ireland has released the results of its first-ever survey on pro bono legal work. As befits a day that is mostly about celebrating, the results are encouraging. The results also mirror a lot of our experience in the United States regarding how and why — or why not — lawyers are contributing to the common good, says Kevin Curnin of the Association of Pro Bono Counsel.