New HUD Rule Expands Harassment And Liability Claims

Law360, New York (November 23, 2015, 3:17 PM EST) -- Hard on the heels of the Supreme Court's disparate impact decision and the release of the final Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule last summer, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has released a proposed rule that clarifies two types of harassment claims under the Fair Housing Act. 80 Fed. Reg. 63720 (Oct. 21, 2015). The first is so-called "quid pro quo" (QPQ) harassment — literally, "this for that" harassment — where a person is subjected to an unwelcome demand based on the person's protected characteristic and submission is required as a condition to the person's housing. This would commonly include sex-based harassment, for example, such as a demand for sexual favors in exchange for renting a unit or maintaining waiting list status. QPQ harassment may occur, says HUD, even where the victim acquiesces to the demand....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!