Obama Immigration Case: Interpreting The Oral Arguments

Law360, New York (April 29, 2016, 12:11 PM EDT) -- On April 18, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Texas, the case where Texas led the charge, along with 25 other states, to challenge the president's 2014 executive action which called for deferred deportation for certain individuals present in the U.S. without lawful immigration status. The executive action at issue expanded an existing program that deferred deportation for qualifying childhood arrivals (DACA — Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and added a new program to defer deportation for parents of Americans and lawful permanent residents (DAPA — Deferred Action for Parents of Americans)....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!