Siddharth Hariharan, et al v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al

  1. March 24, 2015

    9th Circ. Buries Recusal Bid In Apple Anti-Poach Suit

    A would-be intervenor's bid to remove the California federal judge overseeing an antitrust class action accusing Apple Inc., Google Inc. and others of illegally agreeing to not poach engineers came to an end Monday, after he missed the deadline to file an opening brief.

  2. August 25, 2014

    Fake Filer Forks Over 9th Circ. Fees In 'No Poach' Appeal

    A would-be intervenor in the antitrust class action accusing Apple Inc., Google Inc. and others of illegally agreeing not to poach engineers paid the fees Monday to appeal an order denying his bid to remove Judge Lucy H. Koh from the case after the Ninth Circuit had threatened to toss the appeal.

  3. August 11, 2014

    9th Circ. Tells Fake Filer In 'No-Poach' Case To Pay Up

    The Ninth Circuit on Monday threatened to toss out continued attempts to remove the judge overseeing the massive antitrust lawsuit accusing Apple Inc. and other tech giants of illegally agreeing not to poach engineers, telling the would-be intervenor, whose original bid was found to have been falsely filed, to pay for his appeal.