In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:11-cv-06714
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Alioto Law Firm
- A&O Shearman
- Bartko Pavia
- Berman Tabacco
- Cravath Swaine
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Dentons
- Faegre Drinker
- Fox Rothschild
- George Feldman
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Hagens Berman
- Hueston Hennigan
- Kaufhold Gaskin
- Kellogg Hansen
- Kendall Brill
- King & Spalding
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale
- Maddin Hauser
- Massumi & Consoli
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Miller Canfield
- Miller Wanner
- Munger Tolles
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Saveri & Saveri
- Sheppard Mullin
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Vinson & Elkins
- Walker Stevens
- Weil Gotshal
- White & Case
- Willkie Farr
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
- A&E Television Networks LLC
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Epic Games Inc.
- Google LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Playtika Ltd.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Showtime Networks Inc.
- Skype Technologies SA
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Starz LLC
- Valve Corp.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 01, 2013
App Store Monopoly Claims Don't Add Up, Apple Says
Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge on Monday to dismiss an iPhone customer class action over the tech giant's alleged illegal monopoly of the iPhone aftermarket through its App Store, arguing the plaintiffs haven't proven their standing to sue Apple instead of the third-party developers.
-
September 06, 2013
IPhone Users Take Another Crack At Monopoly Suit
A group of iPhone users on Thursday renewed class action claims against Apple Inc. in a bid to avoid having its suit dismissed again, adding details to its allegations that the company illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its App Store.
-
August 15, 2013
Apple Dodges IPhone App Store Monopoly Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday threw out iPhone users' class action claims that Apple Inc. illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its app store and demanded a cut of third-party sales, saying the plaintiffs failed to establish standing to sue.
-
March 05, 2013
Apple's App Store Not An Illegal Monopoly, Judge Hears
Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge Tuesday to toss iPhone customers' class claims that the tech giant illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its app store and demanded a cut of third-party sales, arguing that the plaintiffs have failed to show Apple violated antitrust laws.
-
November 05, 2012
Apple Says IPhone Service Monopoly Suit Ignores Court Order
Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge on Friday to dismiss a newly refiled class action claiming it monopolized the aftermarket for iPhone services, arguing that plaintiffs disregarded a court order to add AT&T Mobility LLC as a defendant.