In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:11-cv-06714
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Kendall Brill
- Goodwin Procter
- Skadden Arps
- Alioto Law Firm
- White & Case
- Massumi & Consoli
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Dentons
- Paul Hastings
- Fox Rothschild
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Wilson Sonsini
- Perkins Coie
- Gibson Dunn
- Hueston Hennigan
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Kwun Bhansali
- Munger Tolles
- Cravath Swaine
- Winston & Strawn
- Willkie Farr
- A&O Shearman
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Miller Wanner
- Kellogg Hansen
- Faegre Drinker
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Vinson & Elkins
- Miller Canfield
- Hagens Berman
- Quinn Emanuel
- King & Spalding
- George Feldman
- Weil Gotshal
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Kaufhold Gaskin
- Bartko Pavia
- Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Maddin Hauser
- Sheppard Mullin
- Berman Tabacco
- Orrick Herrington
- Saveri & Saveri
- Walker Stevens
- Latham & Watkins
Companies
- Starz LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Epic Games Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Google LLC
- Apple Inc.
- A&E Television Networks LLC
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Showtime Networks Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- Playtika Ltd.
- Skype Technologies SA
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 05, 2012
Apple Says IPhone Service Monopoly Suit Ignores Court Order
Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge on Friday to dismiss a newly refiled class action claiming it monopolized the aftermarket for iPhone services, arguing that plaintiffs disregarded a court order to add AT&T Mobility LLC as a defendant.