Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. SLRA Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:19-cv-06131

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Insurance

Judge:

Jacqueline Scott Corley

Firms

  1. April 29, 2022

    Investment Co. And Insurer Drop $2.5M Defense Cost Dispute

    An investment firm and an insurance unit of The Hartford dropped a $2.5 million defense costs coverage dispute over a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, the policyholder and the carrier told a California federal court on Friday.

  2. December 17, 2021

    Investment Firm Says Insurer 'Blindsided' It With Litigation

    A real estate investment firm urged a California judge to reject its insurer's demand that it repay $2.5 million in defense costs from a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, arguing that its conduct did not trigger an illegal profit exclusion in its management liability policy.

  3. November 19, 2021

    Investor, Insurer Both Seek Wins In SEC Coverage Row

    Twin City Fire Insurance Co. told a California federal judge it should be reimbursed for the $2.5 million it spent defending an investor in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, claiming its excess liability policy barred coverage for illegal profits.