Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al.
Case Number:
23-411
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- American Center for Law & Justice Inc.
- Arnold & Porter
- Ballard Spahr
- Boyden Gray
- Charis Lex
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
- Dhillon Law Group
- Gerstein Harrow
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Siri & Glimstad
- Stris & Maher
- Tycko & Zavareei
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
- American Academy of Pediatrics
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation
- Atlantic Legal Foundation Inc.
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Institute for Free Speech
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 18, 2024
High Court Doubts Feds Coerced Social Media Cos.
A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court appeared unconvinced Monday that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by working with social media platforms to combat the spread of misinformation, often chiding Louisiana's solicitor general for presenting confusing and overly expansive arguments.
-
March 16, 2024
Up Next At High Court: Gov't Jawboning & Retaliatory Arrests
The U.S. Supreme Court has a packed oral arguments calendar this week that includes disputes over the Biden administration's work with social media companies to combat misinformation, the appropriate evidence standard for bringing retaliatory arrest claims and whether the federal government can object to a consent decree entered into by three states.
-
February 05, 2024
States Ask Justices To End Feds' Alleged Online Censorship
The Biden administration is trying to "flip the First Amendment on its head" by arguing that the government has free speech rights that are being trampled by an order banning it from working with social media companies to combat disinformation, Louisiana and Missouri have told the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
January 01, 2024
5 Supreme Court Cases To Watch This Spring
"Blockbuster," "momentous" and "historic" are all words that have been used to describe the U.S. Supreme Court's current term as the justices prepare for a spring docket jam-packed with questions over the level of deference courts should give federal agencies, whether and how social media companies should be regulated and whether government efforts to combat misinformation crosses the line between persuasion and coercion.
-
December 20, 2023
Feds Tell Justices Web 'Misinformation' Work Wasn't Coercive
The Biden administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a Fifth Circuit order prohibiting it from working with social media companies to combat misinformation, arguing the appellate court's understanding of coercive government actions is flawed and severely limits federal agencies' abilities to discuss issues of public concern.
-
December 11, 2023
RFK Jr. Can't Join High Court Social Media Work Showdown
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cannot intervene in a case challenging efforts by members of the Biden administration and certain federal agencies to work with social media companies to combat the spread of misinformation online, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday.
-
October 27, 2023
RFK Jr. Wants In On Social Media Showdown At High Court
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to intervene in a case challenging efforts by members of the Biden administration and certain federal agencies to work with social media companies to combat the spread of misinformation, telling the U.S. Supreme Court that he has been "specifically targeted for suppression."
-
October 03, 2023
5th Circ. Extends Ban On Biden Social Media Work To CISA
The Fifth Circuit on Tuesday issued a revised opinion that includes the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency in a preliminary injunction blocking White House officials and some agencies from working with social media companies to combat disinformation, a development that comes amid the government's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.