Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.
Case Number:
24-354
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Best Best & Krieger
- Boyden Gray
- Broadband Legal Strategies
- Clement & Murphy
- Cooper & Kirk
- Covington & Burling
- DLA Piper
- Fletcher Heald
- Hobbs Straus
- HWG LLP
- Jenner & Block
- Kelley Drye
- Littler Mendelson
- Morgan Lewis
- Nelson Mullins
- Reed Smith
- Spero Law LLC
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Venable LLP
- Weil Gotshal
- Wilkinson Barker
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association Inc.
- Alliance Defending Freedom
- American Association of School Administrators
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation
- Cato Institute
- Competitive Carriers Association
- Competitive Enterprise Institute
- Immigration Reform Law Institute
- National Federation of Independent Business
- National Foreign Trade Council
- National Taxpayers Union
- New Civil Liberties Alliance
- Pacific Legal Foundation
- Public Citizen Inc.
- The Software & Information Industry Association
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 01, 2024
Phone 'Tax' For FCC Programs Unconstitutional, Justices Told
Groups challenging the Federal Communications Commission's universal service system urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to throw out the program's funding base, arguing it amounts to an illegal tax on consumers.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →