Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
IN RE: Bill of Lading Transmission and Processing System Patent Litigation
Case Number:
1:09-md-02050
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Baker & Hostetler
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Carlson Caspers
- Dinsmore & Shohl
- Fabian VanCott
- Frost Brown
- Holland & Hart
- Isaac Wiles
- Keating Muething
- Miller Canfield
- Neal Gerber
- Norton Rose
- Porter Wright
- Smith Gambrell
- Squire Patton
- Stinson LLP
- Thompson Hine
- Vorys
- Wood Herron
Companies
- DriverTech LLC
- Intermec, Inc.
- Interstate Distributor Co.
- Pegasus
- Pegasus Transtech LLC
- Pitt Ohio Express LLC
- QUALCOMM Inc.
- R&L Carriers Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 12, 2017
Qualcomm Wins $1.8M Fees In Shipping Logistics IP Case
An Ohio federal judge has awarded Qualcomm Inc. more than $1.8 million in attorneys' fees after the tech company successfully beat an infringement suit by R&L Carriers Inc. over a patent covering a method for streamlining shipping logistics, saying the case was "exceptional" under the high court's Octane Fitness ruling.
-
January 24, 2017
Exceptional Shipping IP MDL Justifies $3.6M In Fees: Judge
A group of companies that beat a freight shipping company’s multidistrict infringement campaign against them and others including Qualcomm Inc. can pursue their bid for $3.6 million in attorneys’ fees after an Ohio federal judge ruled Tuesday the patent case was exceptional.
-
December 09, 2016
Qualcomm Shouldn't Get $2M In Fees After IP Win, Court Told
Qualcomm should not be allowed to collect $2 million in attorneys' fees from a freight shipping company that lost a patent infringement case in multidistrict litigation against the technology giant, the Ohio-based company told the Southern District of Ohio on Friday.
-
September 28, 2016
Qualcomm Awarded Attys' Fees In 'Exceptional' IP Win
An Ohio federal judge said Wednesday that Qualcomm Inc. is entitled to attorneys' fees estimated at approximately $2 million after the tech company successfully defended against a patent infringement suit brought by R&L Carriers Inc. in multidistrict litigation, saying the case was "exceptional" under the high court's Octane Fitness ruling.
-
August 30, 2016
Judge Dumps Trucking Logistics Patent MDL Under Alice
An Ohio federal judge has tossed a multidistrict patent infringement lawsuit that R&L Carriers Inc. brought against four shipping services companies, finding Monday that a method of streamlining shipping logistics is an abstract idea ineligible for protection under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice decision.
-
November 10, 2015
Qualcomm Seeks $2M In Attys' Fees For Logistics IP Row
Qualcomm Inc. on Monday sought nearly $2 million in attorneys' fees from a freight shipping company that engaged for more than six years in multidistrict litigation in Ohio federal court over infringement claims for its trucking logistics patent.
-
July 16, 2010
Qualcomm Wireless Document IP Suit Nixed Again
A federal judge has again dismissed a suit accusing Qualcomm Inc. and five other companies of infringing a patent for sending documents wirelessly from vehicles, ruling that the amended pleadings failed to plausibly state a claim.
-
February 24, 2010
Qualcomm Evades Wireless Transmission Patent Suit
A federal judge has tossed a suit accusing Qualcomm Inc. of inducing its customers to infringe a patent for sending documents wirelessly from vehicles, ruling that R&L Carriers Inc. neglected to allege a plausible intent to cause infringement.