Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

  1. January 31, 2014

    Vringo Patent In Google Case Tentatively Nixed By USPTO

    One of the Vringo Inc. patents that Google Inc. was recently ordered to pay an ongoing royalty for infringing has been preliminarily rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Vringo said Friday, adding that it was confident the decision would be reversed.

  2. January 28, 2014

    AOL, Google Face Higher Royalty Rate After AdWords IP Loss

    A Virginia federal judge set the ongoing royalty rate Tuesday in a dispute over a Vringo Inc. subsidiary's search engine advertisement patents, agreeing with the plaintiff that AOL Inc., Google Inc., Target Corp. and others' continued willful infringement with AdWords warranted a higher rate.

  3. January 22, 2014

    AOL, Google, Target Owe Ongoing Royalties For New AdWords

    A Virginia federal judge on Tuesday found that AOL Inc., Google Inc., Target Corp. and others' new modified version of Adwords still infringes a Vringo Inc. subsidiary's search engine advertisement patents, and ordered ongoing royalties as long as the defendants use the updated system.

  4. January 03, 2014

    Google, Others Levied $16M In Search Engine Patent Row

    A Virginia federal judge on Friday ordered AOL Inc., Google Inc., Target Corp. and others to pay more than $16 million to a Vringo Inc. subsidiary for supplemental damages and prejudgment interest after the companies were found last year to infringe its search engine advertisement patents.

  5. August 30, 2013

    Vringo Wants Google Sanctioned Over AdWords Docs

    Vringo Inc. told a judge Thursday that Google Inc. should be sanctioned for failing to comply with a court order requiring it to turn over documents on how it has redesigned its AdWords program to avoid infringing Vringo's search engine advertisement patents.

  6. August 19, 2013

    Google Ordered To Pay Vringo Royalties On Search Ad Patent

    A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Vringo Inc. is entitled to ongoing royalties from Google Inc. and other companies that were found last year to infringe its search engine advertisement patents, but said further proceedings are needed to determine the amount.

  7. July 25, 2013

    USPTO Says It Verified Vringo Ad Patent In $30M Google Case

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said Wednesday that it had confirmed the validity of a Vringo Inc. search engine advertisement patent that was at issue in a $30 million infringement verdict last year against Google Inc. and other companies.

  8. April 03, 2013

    Google Can't Duck $30M Verdict In Vringo Patent Case

    A Virginia federal judge on Wednesday denied Google Inc.'s bid to overturn a $30 million patent infringement verdict, rejecting the search giant's argument that ringtone maker Vringo Inc. hadn't shown it had suffered any damages after it filed suit in September 2011.

  9. February 01, 2013

    Vringo Can't Add To $30M Verdict In Google IP Case

    A Virginia federal judge on Thursday denied a bid by ringtone maker Vringo Inc. to add to its $30 million patent infringement verdict against Google Inc., rejecting its argument that he should not have limited damages to the past year.

  10. December 19, 2012

    Vringo Seeks New Damages Trial After $30M Win Over Google

    Six weeks after winning a $30 million patent infringement verdict against Google Inc., ringtone maker Vringo Inc. blasted a Virginia federal court Tuesday for limiting its damages to only the past year, asking for a new trial on damages.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!