Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. II
-
Notice | Filed: January 19, 2021 | Entered: January 19, 2021 Schuman v. Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Bradley Bell, Richard Burns, Greg Ethridge, Daniel J. Hennessy, Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV, Juan Carlos Mas, Gretchen W. McClain, Jim O'Neil III, Peter Shea. Document filed by Thomas Schuman. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Monteverde, Juan)
-
Order | Filed: December 09, 2020 | Entered: December 09, 2020 Schuman v. Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Order for Initial Pretrial Conference
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear for an initial pretrial conference, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at 10:00 a.m. on February 1, 2021, to be held telephonically. The parties are directed to dial 888-398-2342 or 215-861-0674, and enter access code 5598827. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Initial Conference set for 2/1/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/9/2020) (kv)
-
Order | Filed: December 09, 2020 Schuman v. Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Order
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil P rocedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/9/2020) (kv)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login