Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bartels & Feureisen
-
Misc | Filed: May 16, 2024 | Entered: May 16, 2024 McKnight v. 65 Dune Road LLC et. al.
Contract: Other | New York Eastern
Transcript
TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on May 10, 2024, before Judge Kuo. Court Transcriber: AMM TRANSCRIPTION/Adrienne Mignano. Email address: adriennemignano40@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.File redaction request using event "Redaction Request - Transcript" located under "Other Filings - Other Documents". Redaction Request due 6/6/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/17/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/14/2024. (RC)
-
Order | Filed: May 15, 2024 | Entered: May 15, 2024 Hickey v. Better Carting Service, Inc. et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Scheduling Order
SCHEDULING ORDER:This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause for general pretrial supervision. ECF No. 31. A telephonic status conference before Magistrate Judge Krause is hereby scheduled for Thursday, July 11, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. To access the teleconference, please follow these directions: (1) dial the meeting number: (877)-336-1831; (2) enter the access code: 2751700; and (3) press pound (#) to enter the teleconference as a guest. Should counsel experience any technical issues with the teleconferencing system, please contact Chambers at (914) 390-4070. SO ORDERED. Telephone Conference set for 7/11/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 5/15/2024) (jca)
-
Order | Filed: May 15, 2024 Hickey v. Better Carting Service, Inc. et al
Civil Rights: Jobs | New York Southern
Order
ORDER In order to facilitate the progress of pre-trial discovery in this litigation in a just, speedy and inexpensive manner, to ensure compliance with the case management plan, and to prevent the accumulation of unresolved discovery issues, the following procedures will be followed for the resolution of discovery disputes: The party objecting to disclosure, claiming an insufficient response to a discovery request, asserting a privilege, or raising any other form of discovery dispute bears the burden of coming forward by bringing the dispute to the attention of the Court as hereinafter set forth. In calculating when a dispute arises, the Court anticipates that the parties will have complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, in that the discovery demand or disclosure at issue, and, where applicable, the adversary's response, have been served. When a party determines it needs either to compel or preclude discovery, the party must, within 3 business days, confer in good faith with the adverse party or parties in person, by video, or by telephone to attempt to resolve the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 3 business days of the completion of the meet-and-confer process, the objecting party then has 3 business days to bring the issue to the attention of the Court by filing a letter motion requesting a conference, in accordanc e with Local Civil Rule 37.2. The letter motion must not exceed 3 single-spaced pages, unless otherwise specified by the Court. Any adverse party has 3 business days thereafter to submit a response, which also must not exceed 3 single-spaced pages . Counsel may annex to the letter submissions the relevant portions of the discovery demands or responses at issue, and/or relevant portions of documents in dispute. Written replies will not be accepted. In most cases, the parties will have an opp ortunity to make oral replies to points made in the letters at an in-person conference regarding the dispute. When a legal privilege is asserted as a basis for refusing to comply with a discovery demand, the parties must follow the same timetable s et forth above for attempting to resolve the dispute and raising the issue with the Court. The time limitations set forth herein and in any other scheduling orders of the Court are to be strictly observed, and the parties and counsel are not author ized to extend any of the set time limitations without the prior approval of the Court. On matters assigned for pre-trial supervision, any party wishing to file objections to a discovery ruling entered orally on the record must, on the date of the ruling, order a transcript of the proceeding in which the ruling was issued. The transcript must be ordered on a 2-day expedited basis, or faster. The objecting party then shall have 14 days from the date of the receipt of the transcript to file an y objections with the assigned District Judge. A failure to order the record in accordance with these directions may result in a failure to timely file objections. Finally, if issues arise during depositions that require the intervention of the Court, counsel may contact chambers by telephone at 914-390-4070 during the deposition for a ruling. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 5/15/2024) (jca)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login