Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Court Denies Fees In 'Objectively Specious' Trade Secrets Suit

By Andrew Karpan · October 23, 2024, 10:50 PM EDT

A Seattle federal judge has agreed that a dental health insurer litigated an "objectively specious" trade secrets lawsuit against two of its former company officials, but ruled that not enough showed...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Dental Health Services Inc et al v. Miller et al

Case Number

2:23-cv-00383

Court

Washington Western

Nature of Suit

Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)

Date Filed

March 15, 2023

Recent Articles By Andrew

March 19, 2025
Revlon Settles Trade Secrets Case Over Britney Spears' Scent
January 28, 2025
Arguments Lined Up Against NCAA's $2.8B NIL Settlement
December 17, 2024
Canadian Gets 2 Years For Stealing Secrets Tesla Bought
November 25, 2024
Calif. Panel Scraps Ex-Medical Supply Exec's $533K Fee Win
November 15, 2024
FanDuel Dropped From Suit Over MLB Players' NIL Use
November 15, 2024
New Trade Secrets Case Brought In Trucker Tracking Row
November 04, 2024
Startup Beats $460M Cancer Trade Secrets Case In Delaware
October 28, 2024
Ex-Oracle Manager, Software Co. Face Trade Secrets Suit
October 25, 2024
Vidal Warned Of 'Heightened' Burden, 'Loophole' In Seed Fight
July 19, 2024
PTAB Invalidates Claims In Amsted Railcar Patent