Spitalnick v. King & Spalding, LLP

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:24-cv-01367

Court:

Maryland

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge:

James K Bredar

Firms

Sectors & Industries:

  1. December 23, 2025

    4 Rulings In Discrimination Cases Against Law Firms In 2025

    A New Jersey appeals court took an expansive view of state law in a former Reed Smith attorney's sex and pay bias suit, and a federal court set a former DLA Piper associate's pregnancy bias suit on a path to trial in 2026. Here's a look back at a quartet of notable rulings in cases against law firms from the past year.

  2. February 25, 2025

    King & Spalding Beats Bias Suit Over Summer Program

    King & Spalding LLP won't have to face a discrimination suit filed by a straight white woman who says she was dissuaded from applying to a summer associate program open only to "diverse" applicants, a Maryland federal court has ruled, saying she has not sufficiently demonstrated a real intent to apply to the position and therefore lacks standing.

  3. September 20, 2024

    King & Spalding Fights Bias Suit Over Summer Program

    King & Spalding LLP is urging a Maryland federal judge to toss a discrimination suit filed by a straight white woman who says she was dissuaded from applying to a summer associate program open only to "diverse" applicants, arguing the student suffered no injury since she did not apply.

  4. July 12, 2024

    4 Law Firm Bias Cases To Watch In 2024's 2nd Half

    Jones Day and Foley & Lardner LLP are among the powerhouse law firms attempting to fend off accusations that they subjected lawyers to discrimination. Here, Law360 looks at four ongoing employment suits against law firms that are worth watching in the back half of 2024.

  5. May 10, 2024

    King & Spalding Accused Of Anti-White, Pro-LGBTQ Bias

    A straight white woman is suing King & Spalding LLP alleging discrimination after getting the green light from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, claiming she incurred "significant damages" when she was dissuaded from applying to a summer associate program open only to "diverse" applicants.