Yapp USA Automotive Systems v. National Labor Relations Board, et al

Track this case

Case Number:

24-1754

Court:

Appellate - 6th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

2790 Labor Litigation: Other

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. June 12, 2025

    6th Circ. Skeptical Of Auto Co.'s NLRB Constitutionality Suit

    A Sixth Circuit panel appeared unlikely Thursday to back an auto parts manufacturer's request to block a National Labor Relations Board prosecution because of alleged constitutional defects in the agency's structure, as the judges probed whether an agency judge's decision against the company and the board's lack of a quorum affect the dispute.

  2. March 07, 2025

    Dem AGs Back NLRB In Appeal Over Board Functionality

    Nearly two dozen Democratic attorneys general have backed the National Labor Relations Board in a Sixth Circuit fight over the agency's ability to adjudicate unfair labor practice cases, saying workers' rights under labor law would be trampled if the agency is restrained from performing its duties.

  3. February 27, 2025

    NLRB Tells 6th Circ. Constitution Args Can't Block Board Case

    The National Labor Relations Board has asked the Sixth Circuit to deny an auto parts manufacturer's bid to pause an NLRB case on constitutional grounds, saying the company hasn't shown it would suffer the type of harm that justifies an injunction if the case moves forward.

  4. October 02, 2024

    Auto Parts Co. Tells 6th Circ. NLRB Judge Is 'Unaccountable'

    An auto parts manufacturer urged the Sixth Circuit to halt National Labor Relations Board proceedings against the company before an "unaccountable" agency judge, arguing the employer would face harm because the administrative judge is unconstitutionally shielded from removal by the president.

  5. September 30, 2024

    AFL-CIO Backs NLRB In 6th Circ. Constitutionality Review

    The United Auto Workers urged the Sixth Circuit not to block a National Labor Relations Board administrative suit accusing a car parts maker of firing a worker to stifle a union drive, saying the proceeding, which the company claims is unconstitutional, hasn't actually harmed it.